William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

[_William Schryver]

There can be no doubt that many apologists would find Willie embarrassing. They tend to prefer the attacks of someone like Pahoran. Many won't engage in the direct sort of attacks that Pahoran engages in, but find secret enjoyment when he does so. He's kind like their proxy for bad behavior.

Will, OTOH, is far too sexually vulgar to please other apologists in this manner.

There's some sort of email group that, at least at one time, many of the internet defenders of the faith participated on. Not skinny-l, something more for the masses. I remember a bit of a scandal when a fellow defender of the faith was kicked off the email group. I wonder if it was Will. There was behind the scenes whispering at Z that the guy was kicked off due to offensive behavior towards some of the women.

Ooooooooohhhhhh ... whispers and rumor and scandalous innuendo!

How I relish a good tale of ribaldry!

Keep it coming, beastlie. Feel free to embellish as necessary in order to "flesh" out the story.

[_beastie]

Were you kicked off an email group?

[_William Schryver]

Were you kicked off an email group?

Not yet.

But the night is young!

Besides, you weren't concerned with the facts when you commenced this salacious whisper campaign, so don't go frigid on us now.

[_beastie]

Not yet.

But the night is young!

Besides, you weren't concerned with the facts when you commenced this salacious whisper campaign, so don't go frigid on us now.

I repeated what I heard in front of you so you could respond, and I was quite specific in what I had heard. How is that not being concerned with the facts?

[_William Schryver]

beastlie:

... I was quite specific in what I had heard.

Hardly.

You gave us nothing!

You started this saucy little tangent with such promise; only to dash our hopes for ribaldry in a flaccid retreat.

How disappointing ...

[_Kevin Graham]

Will thinks his obsessive reliance on the thesauraus will save him from looking stupid. You can always tell how desperate he gets by his choice of words. This thread is particularly telling. As he began to look dumber and dumber, he thought he had to change the title of this thread, thinking the use of "scatologist" would make him look smarter than if he had used "sciolist."

It is funny how Will flat out lies about what he has said in recent posts, and yet accuses beastie of creating rumors. For instance, Will said quite definitively that Sidney Rigdon was a polygamist. He provided a source from left field, thinking no one here had read it. When it turned out it was Will was the who had not read the source, he tries to weasel his way out of his error by saying he wasn't wrong at all, since what he said was supported by rumors.



The idiotic tradition of Schryverism keeps going strong.

[_beastie]

Hardly.

You gave us nothing!

You started this saucy little tangent with such promise; only to dash our hopes for ribaldry in a flaccid retreat.

How disappointing ...

I don't think I've ever met anyone who so obsessively uses sexual terms to describe everything. LDS generally are not comfortable with this type of behavior. And, by the way, it really doesn't present the picture of Will = Stud. In fact, quite the opposite.

You seem to find something objectionable in that I directly asked you about a rumor I had heard. Would you find it even more objectionable if I had, instead:

1 - simply hinted that I "knew" something about you in real life and had to bite my tongue to refrain from sharing it, hence allowing listeners to speculate the worst? (see: DCP)

2 - developed an even more salacious tidbit, like, say, "Will had an affair with the teen who babysits his children, and visits prostitutes", and had it published in a local paper of notable influence in the community? (see: early LDS leaders)

Yeah, Kevin, it is ironic that Will continued to justified his flat-out erroneous statement about Rigdon by accepting rumors that had been created without the slightest justification, with the obvious intent to just malign his character, while objecting to me asking him directly about a rumor. Rigdon's real life presented no reason to suspect the rumor was true. Will's behavior on this board presents abundant reason to suspect the rumor I heard was true, and he still objects to my bringing it up, giving him a chance to respond, accusing me of starting a whispering campaign. I've never really interacted much with Will before, due to my lack of interest in the Book of Abraham, so I had no opinion about his "performance" abilities. I'm beginning to form the opinion his performance is "flaccid", and his "prowess" exists largely in his own mind (to use language that will make Will feel at home).

[_Pokatator]

My speculation on Willie is that he is trying to over compensate for his inadequacies; intellectually, physically and socially. Usually when you see a guy beating his chest like Tarzan beefing up his virility, his conquests, his studness, usually they are the opposite. That is how I see Will when he constantly infers sexually into everything. I can pretty much stomach guys like this in male gatherings, locker room talk, on the golf course, male work settings, and etc. But what really offends me is when be berates females and even his wife. This is a great big character flaw in my opinion. He sees women as an object, a sex object.

So, in my view, Willie was rejected by the women in his life whether it started with his mom, who knows, but most likely he had no girl friends growing up. Also I think Willie was blessed with being born with a very small penis and now tries to compensate for it.

Truly, Willie does not equal stud.

[_Gadianton Plumber]

My speculation on Willie is that he is trying to over compensate for his inadequacies; intellectually, physically and socially. Usually when you see a guy beating his chest like Tarzan beefing up his virility, his conquests, his studness, usually they are the opposite. That is how I see Will when he constantly infers sexually into everything. I can pretty much stomach guys like this in male gatherings, locker room talk, on the golf course, male work settings, and etc. But what really offends me is when be berates females and even his wife. This is a great big character flaw in my opinion. He sees women as an object, a sex object.

So, in my view, Willie was rejected by the women in his life whether it started with his mom, who knows, but most likely he had no girl friends growing up. Also I think Willie was blessed with being born with a very small penis and now tries to compensate for it.

Truly, Willie does not equal stud.

He has a wife? How do you know?

[_Pokatator]

He has a wife? How do you know?

I guess I don't know that for absolute fact but he claims to and always was on this board. Also, DCP, has claimed to have met Willie, his wife, and a daughter. That quote is contained above. I find DCP more trustworthy than Willie even though he has pulled a few goofs too.

So I do find it reasonable to assume that Willie has at least one wife.