Gazelam wrote:Women who are sealed to their husbands in the Temple already have the priesthood.
Paul Osborne wrote:Women who have been endowed have been ordained to hold the priesthood. The sealing doesn't ordain women. A woman does NOT need to be sealed to hold the priesthood. Neither does a man.
Personally I think you're both wrong. Over time church leaders have repeatedly refuted the notion that women hold the priesthood in any sense, either through their endowments or through their husbands.
Joseph F. Smith, 1907 wrote:A wife does not hold the priesthood in connection with her husband, but she enjoys the benefits thereof with him; and if she is requested to lay hand on the sick with him . . . she may do so with perfect propriety. It is no uncommon thing for a man and wife unitedly to administer to their children, and the husband being mouth, he may properly say out of courtesy, “By authority of the holy priesthood in us vested.”
Rudger Clawson, April 1921 wrote:The Priesthood is not received, or held, or exercised in any degree, by the women of the Church; but nevertheless, the women of the Church enjoy the blessings of the Priesthood through their husbands.
Charles W. Penrose, 1921 wrote:There seems to be a revival of the idea among some of our sisters that they hold the priesthood . . . When a woman is sealed to a man holding the Priesthood, she becomes one with him . . . She receives blessings in association with him . . . Sisters have said to me sometimes, “But, I hold the Priesthood with my husband.” “Well,” I asked, “what office do you hold in the Priesthood?” Then they could not say much more. The sisters are not ordained to any office in the Priesthood and there is authority in the Church which they cannot exercise; it does not belong to them; they cannot do that properly any more than they can change themselves into a man.
Relief Society Bulletin, February 1914 wrote:Women do not hold the Priesthood. This fact must be faced calmly by mothers and explained clearly to young women, for the spirit that is now abroad in the world makes for women’s demand for every place and office enjoyed by men, and a few more than men can’t enter. Women in this Church must not forget that they have rights which men do not possess. They have their own field, their own duties, their own privileges. It is cowardly to dodge this question in dealing with young women. But let the whole facts be stated. Then women will see how richly they are endowed and how righteously their place in this life and the life to come has been provided for.
LDS.org, 'Women in the Church', 2009 wrote:In weekly worship services and classes, women preach sermons, offer prayers in behalf of the congregation, and teach adults and children. They may also serve as missionaries and as presidents of the Relief Society, Young Women, and Primary organizations. Women participate in councils that oversee congregational activities throughout the world. They also perform a vital work in nurturing and teaching in the home. ... The priesthood—the authority of God to perform ordinances and act in His name—is conferred only on worthy male members of the Church. Men who hold the priesthood have no advantage over women in qualifying for salvation or eternal life through the Atonement of Jesus Christ.
Quotes found
here,
here and
here.
There's also the fact that if women really hold the priesthood (either through sealings or endowments), then why can't endowed women perform ordinances outside of the temple such as blessing and passing the sacrament, anointing the sick, baptizing people, standing as witnesses for baptisms, conferring the gift of the Holy Ghost, etc.? Sorry, but I'm not going to give the church much "woman priesthood" credit for letting women perform a single ordinance in the temple which would clearly be indelicate to have men perform on women.
So I reject the interpretation that LDS women hold any kind of priesthood, either through their husbands or their endowments. Some of the church's earliest leaders may have intended that, but the church has clearly moved away from the idea.