The Cassius Review of Books: "Truth Restored"

[_Darth J]

It's pretty old news.

bcspace: do you agree with this official church publication that the Anthon manuscript is authentic reformed Egyptian?

[_bcspace]

It's pretty old news.

bcspace: do you agree with this official church publication that the Anthon manuscript is authentic reformed Egyptian

?

What's your reference? There is none in the OP

[_bcspace]

Goodness me! I wonder if anyone ever thought of that?

Actually, If I recall correctly, I may have been the one to bring it to Dale's attention.

[_Darth J]

bcspace: do you agree with this official church publication that the Anthon manuscript is authentic reformed Egyptian?

What's your reference? There is none in the OP

Hmmm. What did I say just a few inches ago (depending on the size of one's screen)?

However, on page 15 (of this edition), Elder Hinckley provides us with a picture of reformed Egyptians characters (of course it’s the Anthon manuscript). You know; this:

If you think that I am misrepresenting what is in this book, feel free to order your own copy:

http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Restored-Hi ... 573&sr=8-1

[_MrStakhanovite]

This review is the new hot topic on campus now and it's caused a virtual flood of people at the register’s office, anybody who's anybody among the student body is in Professor Darth's classes.

[_Darth J]

This review is the new hot topic on campus now and it's caused a virtual flood of people at the register’s office, anybody who's anybody among the student body is in Professor Darth's classes.

I wear a leather jacket with tweed elbow patches.

[_bcspace]

What's your reference? There is none in the OP

Hmmm. What did I say just a few inches ago (depending on the size of one's screen)?

I aksed for a reference not a picture. What is the surrounding text? The caption? etc.

If you think that I am misrepresenting what is in this book,

I have not said that you were.

feel free to order your own copy:

Already have one.

[_Darth J]

What's your reference? There is none in the OP

Hmmm. What did I say just a few inches ago (depending on the size of one's screen)?

I aksed for a reference not a picture. What is the surrounding text? The caption? etc.

Page 15 has a picture of the Anthon manuscript.



The picture in the book does not show the word "Caractors" or the first line of symbols you see here (the picture in the book starts with the second line of characters that starts with one that looks like a Y or a 4 followed by a bunch of vertical lines with a line under them). The caption says, "Modified Egyptian characters as they appeared on the plates."

[_bcspace]

The caption says, "Modified Egyptian characters as they appeared on the plates."

Oh. I thought you said "authentic reformed Egyptian". In which case my answer to your question would probably be no. I can see why you want it to be yes though.

[_Paul Osborne]

published by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Damn, everything was going so good until you spelled the name of the church wrong. Simon is going to get you for that!

Paul O