My response to Juliann and Dan G

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

TrashcanMan79 wrote:
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Has anyone seen the Juliann meme generator. ******* pricelss. Priceless...

That would be "[deleted]" at memegenerator.net for you kids following along at home. Current winner: "IF I HAD A BAN FOR EVERY BAN I BANNED, I'D BAN A BANNED BAN-BAN BANNING A BAN!"


The meme about Will Schryver being Juliann's lover is pretty mean. Really, hasn't Will been through enough already? There is no reason to punish him any further by implying that he is Juliann's lover.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_Yoda

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _Yoda »

moksha wrote:We are a litigious and prophetic people.

I still have no idea what this is about. Is it based on some MAD thread, or have the spirits of Dan G and Juliann been channeled through new server updates?

Feuds based on having worn the same shades of leather straps at a MAD rave party, should not be of a long lasting variety. Best to tie both B23 and Nehor up and take turns with the whip.


It really makes more sense if you view this thread from Infy's board:

http://www.exmormonforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4714

The discussion really began over there last night while the board was down.

Shades, you may not have read this thread, either. I was actually copying part of that conversation over. Things will fall into place even better after reading that link.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _harmony »

Dr. Shades wrote:Harmony: I'm 100% serious about having not understood it until Liz explained it.


Oh, I have no doubt about that! (maybe it's a girl thing?)
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _asbestosman »

I understand SGW refers to SeattleGhostWriter and SSW is derogatory take on his name. However, I'm not sure if SWG is just a common typo here, or if it refers to some other unflattering appellation. Anyone?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _MsJack »

Unless I've missed something, "SWG" is just a typo.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _EAllusion »

I beg to differ on a key point in this thread.

"Massimo Introvigne has a posse" is clearly the best Juliann meme. Respect.

Also, whomever is doing the dumb, crude ones should knock it off.
_TrashcanMan79
_Emeritus
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _TrashcanMan79 »

EAllusion wrote:I beg to differ on a key point in this thread.

"Massimo Introvigne has a posse" is clearly the best Juliann meme. Respect.

I must concede the point. Brilliant. Yours?

EAllusion wrote: Also, whomever is doing the dumb, crude ones should knock it off.

+1
_Yoda

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _Yoda »

asbestosman wrote:I understand SGW refers to SeattleGhostWriter and SSW is derogatory take on his name. However, I'm not sure if SWG is just a common typo here, or if it refers to some other unflattering appellation. Anyone?


Sorry...it was a typo...I fixed it.

It was late when I wrote my OP.

;-)
_Tator
_Emeritus
Posts: 3088
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _Tator »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:The meme about Will Schryver being Juliann's lover is pretty mean. Really, hasn't Will been through enough already? There is no reason to punish him any further by implying that he is Juliann's lover.


Is Juliann being insulted here or is it Will?
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
_Yoda

Re: My response to Juliann and Dan G

Post by _Yoda »

Tator wrote:
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:The meme about Will Schryver being Juliann's lover is pretty mean. Really, hasn't Will been through enough already? There is no reason to punish him any further by implying that he is Juliann's lover.


Is Juliann being insulted here or is it Will?


Will!

Not even Will deserves Juliann!

;-)
Post Reply