What's the diff between Celestial and Terrestrial now?

[_MrStakhanovite]

And with that, Shades, I will leave you to pursue your favorite hobby, that of masturbating to your vast collection of Menudo memorabilia.

Simon?

[_thews]

Perhaps it would help if you posted that one page from the HoC that you love so much.

I know it always helps me.

Helps you to avoid questions you can't answer? You're a liar from the word go and a typical example of a false witness.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=14401&start=273

I would contend that PP has knowledge and addresses the questions asked, while Simon Belmont’s tired ruse is to imply he has knowledge, but runs away with tail tucked from the Joseph Smith dead ends he simply cannot answer… like the above. Please Simon, as you continue to demand acknowledgement to your questions, by what divine intervention did Joseph Smith use to come up with the translation of the Kinderhook plates which revealed to Joe Smith the story of Ham?
(note actual data referenced above).

Tell us Simon... who said the words recorded by William Clayton about the descendant of Ham?
(Simon will run away from this just as he always does).


viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15366&start=0

It really is impossible to say that there is "no" evidence for the Book of Mormon.

You see, it is statements like these which confirm my already made judgement that you are nothing more than a bigot, attacking that which he does not understand in the slightest. You know absolutely nothing if you think there is no evidence to support Mormonism.

What evidence do you claim exists Simon? Or will you again, as you always do, tuck tail? Why not link us your evidence? Because it doesn't exist?

[_thews]

Just as long as they don't mount personal attacks, they can hold those views if they wish.

Semantics. Stinky bait still smells like crap. A personal attack is to attack the person and not the argument. I understand not posting Facebook photos. I understand not digging for information on people like Simon Belmont brags about. But limiting free speech is an exercise in futility. I have given you examples of what is supposedly allowed in this forum, and they are, without question, personal attacks that have nothing to do with the argument. Is the intent to bring more visitors to view the sexy Russian women advertized? How about those blinking "You really are the 100,000th visitor" ads targeted at morans? Sorry Dr., but your dividing line is is far too vague to serve its supposed purpose in my opinion. It's your site... do what you wish.

[_Simon Belmont]

Helps you to avoid questions you can't answer? You're a liar from the word go and a typical example of a false witness.

How many IQ points did it take to come up with that?

[_thews]

Helps you to avoid questions you can't answer? You're a liar from the word go and a typical example of a false witness.

How many IQ points did it take to come up with that?

And once again, you post nothing to support your argument... very typical. Please post your evidence to support your supposed argument Simon and link its source. You can't can you? That's because you have no point to make, and you are proven once again to be a liar.

[_Simon Belmont]

And once again, you post nothing to support your argument... very typical. Please post your evidence to support your supposed argument Simon and link its source. You can't can you? That's because you have no point to make, and you are proven once again to be a liar.

Hey thews, I have more evidence for my beliefs in my little finger than you have in your entire body.

[_Dr. Shades]

A personal attack is to attack the person and not the argument. I understand not posting Facebook photos. I understand not digging for information on people like Simon Belmont brags about. But limiting free speech is an exercise in futility. I have given you examples of what is supposedly allowed in this forum, and they are, without question, personal attacks that have nothing to do with the argument. . . Sorry Dr., but your dividing line is is far too vague to serve its supposed purpose in my opinion.

If we go the route you advocate, what will separate the Terrestrial Forum from the Telestial Forum?

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Hello,

The difference is Mopologists can say crappy things in either forum and not be moderated while critics, if we dare respond in kind, will have their posts moved to the Telestial forum.

V/R
Dr. Cameron

[_Yoda]

Hello,

The difference is Mopologists can say s****y things in either forum and not be moderated while critics, if we dare respond in kind, will have their posts moved to the Telestial forum.

V/R
Dr. Cameron

That's BS.

We have all moderated both believers and critics.

Every time we do, we get this whine from both sides of the aisle. Give it a rest, or, put your money where your mouth is, and volunteer to mod.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Every time we do, we get this whine from both sides of the aisle. Give it a rest, or, put your money where your mouth is, and volunteer to mod.

Hello,

Sure. I volunteer to moderate this board.

V/R
Dr. Cameron, NC for Me