stemelbow wrote:Once Joseph is banned we'll see we'll be on a slippery slope to this end. Posters will start getting banned for all sorts of reasons that make no sense. Soon, it'll be Shades, Liz and myself, and the discussion will be pleasant but perhaps a bit stale (mostly thanks to me).
While this slippery slope of disordered banning does exist elsewhere on the net, how exactly should a board react to threats of DMCA terrorism?
moksha wrote:While this slippery slope of disordered banning does exist elsewhere on the net, how exactly should a board react to threats of DMCA terrorism?
Joseph hasn't threatened anyone. He's stating his opinion concerning it all. When he was accused of actually filing complaints he denied it and the accuser recanted. This seems to have been blown way out of proportion. Ingore the dude and everything will be fine. Treat him like he owns the joint, as it seems shades has done, and we'll continue in this pointless drivel. All the hysterical threatening accusations seem meaningless since if he did offer threats and if his actions fo the past have been taken seriously, then it would be pointless to ban him, pointless to do anything. He'd have already destroyed this place. Seriously? Oh boy...
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.