Rambo wrote:You have done a good job at pointing out someone is stupid. Yes you may know him.
He tends to whine a lot and really miss reads just about everything and everyone miss reads him.
Thanks Rambo, that was an adorable addition to this thread.
I'll have to admit Stem you are interesting... I've never talked to someone like you before.
I really think you could be some sort of case study.
I would put you at the top of my list as the most frustrating person to have a discussion with. It's not cause you are right it's just cause you miss read most things people say and then you claim they miss read what you say. It's like we speak a different language.
Rambo wrote:I'll have to admit Stem you are interesting... I've never talked to someone like you before.
I really think you could be some sort of case study.
I would put you at the top of my list as the most frustrating person to have a discussion with. It's not cause you are right it's just cause you miss read most things people say and then you claim they miss read what you say. It's like we speak a different language.
Who is this Miss Read you keep mentioning anyway?
Don't worry too much. You think its all my fault. I think the miscommunication is the fault of us all. I think if you opened up a bit and realized I'm not at fault all on my own you'd get my point a little better. As it is, you seem all closed up and unwilling to accept how absurd some of the critics are being. Once that can get recognized we'll be able to get somewhere in all this.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
stemelbow wrote: Who is this Miss Read you keep mentioning anyway?
Ok that was funny!
Don't worry too much. You think its all my fault. I think the miscommunication is the fault of us all. I think if you opened up a bit and realized I'm not at fault all on my own you'd get my point a little better. As it is, you seem all closed up and unwilling to accept how absurd some of the critics are being. Once that can get recognized we'll be able to get somewhere in all this.
um when everyone says they can't understand you and you are not understanding everyone else. Then I am pretty sure you would be the problem. Denial at it's best!
Rambo wrote:um when everyone says they can't understand you and you are not understanding everyone else. Then I am pretty sure you would be the problem. Denial at it's best!
Sorry Rambo. Critics don't equate to everyone. Man, if you'd just open yor eyes a little you'd realize how much in denial you are.
You see, you can make sense of these past couple of sentences, so you know we can communicate. I think your previous characterization was misplayed. It was a good attempt for sport anyway.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
stemelbow wrote:Shoot girl, I ain't playing whose gotten it worse here. Your complaints above only hallmark the point of this thread to me--it gets far too nasty and absurd sometimes. You actually contributed.
I don't think a single thing I said to you in that other thread was "nasty," let alone "absurd."
stemelbow wrote:if you would just open up a little, learn to love others like me, you might actually benefit from others like me. You wouldn't be so prone to the hostility.
Mansplain it to me a few more times, stemelbow. Maybe then I'll start catering to your distorted sense of entitlement to more of my time.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13
stemelbow wrote:Somewhere between the you're a big meanie because you think I'm wrong. you don't have anything to offer and you just plain suck stuff via MsJack
Did a fellow poster call you an anti-[insert religion here] and compare you to murderous 19th century mobocrats? Did someone post a vicious personal attack on your spouse who doesn't even post here?
Sounds like I've got one-up on you. Yet somehow, I didn't feel the need to start a new ego thread calling attention to how picked on I am.
Maybe you should spend a little time pondering why that is.
I hope that you are not referring to me. You posted a mocking post about the I am a Mormon series and I responded. Get over it. In the beginning of Mormonism, there was mocking too. And then the mocking turned to something more violent. There is a progression.
Now your mistake was more or less claiming the the protestants of your own faith are tolerant. I pointed out to you that protestants were burning down Mormon homes in the 1830's and in the 1840s. They were not very tolerant of difference. Thus, your problem.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
why me wrote:I hope that you are not referring to me.
You know perfectly well that I am, and I've already refuted your pathetic attempts at self-justification (here, here, here and here) over on the other thread that you seem to be hiding from now that your buddies at MDDB failed to rescue you on the temple-marriage-commandment question.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13