For Zeez: God and Worship

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

hans castorp wrote:A great many Christians would agree with that proposition. Didn't Calvin call the human mind an idol factory?


Perhaps, but I would say most Christians would disagree with that statement, because it runs counter to synergistic soteriology. Calvin can get away with a low view of man, because Grace is irresistible, the Father calls whom he will.
_hans castorp
_Emeritus
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:26 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _hans castorp »

MrStakhanovite wrote:
hans castorp wrote:A great many Christians would agree with that proposition. Didn't Calvin call the human mind an idol factory?


Perhaps, but I would say most Christians would disagree with that statement, because it runs counter to synergistic soteriology. Calvin can get away with a low view of man, because Grace is irresistible, the Father calls whom he will.


I think most synergists would claim that grace is necessary, even if it's resistible.

I'd agree with you that the Orthodox might have trouble with Calvin's statement, but I think many (certainly historically) Catholics would not. Nor would Arminians.

Got to read The Jungle Book to my youngest. Back later.

hc
Blog: The Use of Talking

"Found him to be the village explainer. Very useful if you happen to be a village; if not, not." --Gertrude Stein
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

hans castorp wrote:I'd agree with you that the Orthodox might have trouble with Calvin's statement, but I think many (certainly historically) Catholics would not. Nor would Arminians.


I’d have to see Calvin’s statement in context, but it’s really not an issue for me, I think something more interesting comes out of your comments…

Humanity is incapable of proper worship due to original sin, but is capable of accepting God’s grace (or resisting it). If God’s grace is accepted, regeneration takes place (heart of stone replaced with a heart of flesh), what then? Is proper worship still an impossibility?
_hans castorp
_Emeritus
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:26 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _hans castorp »

MrStakhanovite wrote:Humanity is incapable of proper worship due to original sin, but is capable of accepting God’s grace (or resisting it). If God’s grace is accepted, regeneration takes place (heart of stone replaced with a heart of flesh), what then? Is proper worship still an impossibility?


This is a knotty theological point that I have mixed feelings about. I'm not even happy with all of the vocabulary. I think that the tradition in the West would say that the regenerate, even though they are cleansed of original sin, still bear its wounds--of intellect and will, among others--and are still subject to concupiscence, not itself sin to Catholics, but sin to most Protestants. The worship they are able to offer is not, in this life, perfectly the worship due to God; it is a type of that worship, which will only be possible in the eschaton, or in heaven.

As I said before, I think your definition of worship is problematic. What did it mean when I said to my wife (we were married according to the 1662 English prayerbook), "With my body I thee worship"?

hc
Blog: The Use of Talking

"Found him to be the village explainer. Very useful if you happen to be a village; if not, not." --Gertrude Stein
_hans castorp
_Emeritus
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:26 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _hans castorp »

MrStakhanovite wrote:I’d have to see Calvin’s statement in context, but it’s really not an issue for me, I think something more interesting comes out of your comments…


Here's Calvin (Institutes Bk 1, Chap 11, Sec 8):

That idols were in use before the prevalence of that ambitious consecration of the images of the dead, frequently adverted to by profane writers, is evident from the words of Moses, (Gen 31: 19) When he relates that Rachel stole her father's images, he speaks of the use of idols as a common vice. Hence we may infer, that the human mind is, so to speak, a perpetual forge of idols.
[/quote]
Blog: The Use of Talking

"Found him to be the village explainer. Very useful if you happen to be a village; if not, not." --Gertrude Stein
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _zeezrom »

MrStakhanovite wrote:Here is my definition of worship:
S is worshiping G if and only if S is expressing maximal deference and reverence towards G.

This definition of worship strikes me as highly intuitive, and falls right in line with the first commandment(s) in the Decalogue that unities the Abrahamic faiths:
Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me

(Exodus 20: 3-5)
God is to be number one in your life, nothing gets priority over God, and if God is the maximally greatest being, this makes sense. But if God isn’t the maximally greatest being, is it right to worship God?
Discuss


Stak,
Let me start by saying how happy I am that you bring this discussion forward to me. I had hoped you would discuss a similar topic before. The fact that a guy who chooses to spend his time with the heavy works of the philosophical geniuses of history has chosen to spend time with me, is an honor.

Your post stirs profound thoughts and ideas. I hope I can adequately set my thoughts to words. I'm going to try my best to dissect your post and address every thought. First - your definition of worship.

Maximal deference might suggest to us a requirement that God be way, way beyond us in power, wisdom, might, judgment, and love. We might even feel it necessary for God to be so far beyond us, God becomes infinitely powerful and wise. Keep this adjective in mind: infinite. This term has huge implications, many of which are negative. This God definition would indeed cause - no, force - any person to express maximal deference and reverence.

Now, let me make it clear that I wholeheartedly reject your assertion that we worship only upon the condition of a maximally powerful God. I don't understand at all how this is highly intuitive or even more intuitive than worshipping a less than maximal God. Here's why:

Worship is not a Boolean. Worship is like perception of art. It is deeply personal a subject to individual tastes and circumstances. Heaven forbid we suppose otherwise! Worship does not begin only after we meet a specified threshold. Worship begins in very small ripples and continues on through a spectrum of both color and intensity. We cannot and should not give worship an ultimatum but rather, we should feel it grow in all its shades.

It is time for me to address your question, "is it right to worship God if this God is not maximally great?" I would like to immediately answer this with a resounding YES. Yes, it is right to worship a flawed, finite God.

First, I must point you to the lack of infinity in the Abrahamic God. This God is bound by massive constraints. At a minimum, this "all-powerful" God must obey free agency and justice. Do you agree with this? This must reduce God to just a very, very powerful entity. How much better is a very muscly God than a less muscly God? Why are people prejudiced against the less muscly one?

Second, I point you to the importance of our bond with humanness. We generally have a need to join ourselves with other humans and human-like objects. We even go so far as to humanize the things we interact with. We do this with animals, computers, dolls, constellations, and much more. I personally feel that the closer God is to us, the more we can truly feel and show reverence towards this God.

Third, wanting God to be maximally great does not make God such. We have books that talk about the Abrahamic God just as we have books that talk about the God of Athens. Nobody can provide evidence that God is maximally great, let alone infinite.

Fourth, multiple Gods is not foreign to Christians. Like it or not, they have the heavy burden of explaining how a single God lives in the context of the Trinity. Three parts of Infinity must be thought of as indiidual, finite parts.

Fifth, mortals find great meaning in a God that visits the earth and walks with us. This single aspect is probably more profound than any other. We sing about it and write poetry and paint pictures about it. This is what brings God into our life. It is knowing the God is/was walking around the earth like us.

Why do people worship their perfect God? The answer is complex but we can agree on some things. It is to find peace, hope, forgiveness, goodness, love, companionship, wisdom, etc. An imperfect God can help us find these things too. Why not?

An argument might be made: if you worship/follow an imperfect God, you might be led astray. It is true. You might. But this is why you must always try to use your own mind to solve problems as well. We all agree that God expects us to try our best to use our own judgment in our decisions, no? I see no difference.

Let me conclude with one of my favorite images. It is this:
Image
This is a marble bas-relief of the Mourning Athena from the Acropolis, 470 B.C.E., courtesy of University of Haifa Library. With helmeted head bowed, Athena leans on the spear she holds as with her left hand on her forehead, she contemplates the names on a gravestone. We see from this image sympathy and adoration for her people.

I find in Athena a being that could embrace us with love and understanding. I find a person very close to my heart - the one I started out with as a child. Somehow, this being feels my insecurities and my troubles as if she had seen them all herself. She lives in the images and words of the Ancients. While she doesn't have the power of the stars nor the stoic grandeur of the God of Abraham, she does seem to understand. She makes me feel that all will be well despite the uncertainty that is bounded around us and Her. I've since prayed to Athena and laid before her feet all my doubts and concerns with trepidation. She answered with calm and love.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Nightlion
_Emeritus
Posts: 9899
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:11 pm

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _Nightlion »

Jersey Girl wrote:Human beings are incapable of worship.


Why would not keeping God uppermost in your thoughts with all your heart, might, mind and strength not be the true worship of God? The natural man cannot do this, agreed. That is why those few, longing to worship God in spirit and in truth, will seek the righteousness of God and repent to beg entrance into his kingdom whereby power is given them after a new creation, their hearts are circumcised, with the love of God put into their inward parts making it possible to keep God uppermost in all our thoughts and truly worship the Lord God all he day long. SEE?

Why stay natural, at enmity with God, incapable of worship and the joy thereof?
The Apocalrock Manifesto and Wonders of Eternity: New Mormon Theology
https://www.docdroid.net/KDt8RNP/the-apocalrock-manifesto.pdf
https://www.docdroid.net/IEJ3KJh/wonders-of-eternity-2009.pdf
My YouTube videos:HERE
_hans castorp
_Emeritus
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:26 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _hans castorp »

zeezrom wrote:Worship does not begin only after we meet a specified threshold. Worship begins in very small ripples and continues on through a spectrum of both color and intensity.


Bingo! Worship is not an all-or-nothing proposition.

I don't think Stak's definition helps, even in Judeo-Christian-Islamic terms. What is "maximal deference or reverence"? Is it the most I can conceive or the most I can feel or the most I can observe?

zeezrom wrote:It is time for me to address your question, "is it right to worship God if this God is not maximally great?" I would like to immediately answer this with a resounding YES. Yes, it is right to worship a flawed, finite God.


Right again, but prescinding from Stak's definition.

zeezrom wrote:First, I must point you to the lack of infinity in the Abrahamic God. This God is bound by massive constraints. At a minimum, this "all-powerful" God must obey free agency and justice. Do you agree with this? This must reduce God to just a very, very powerful entity. How much better is a very muscly God than a less muscly God? Why are people prejudiced against the less muscly one?


According to classical theism, God doesn't obey justice; he is justice--and free agency. He is only constrained in that he cannot do what is not in his nature, which is not an external constraint.

As for "muscliness," I think what theists crave is a God who is ultimate, who is not a member of a genus out of which I choose the most attractive. For me, at least, the question is one of meaning, rather than power, and as Wittgenstein said, "The solution of the riddle of life in space
and time lies outside space and time."

Back to work now; more later.

hc
Blog: The Use of Talking

"Found him to be the village explainer. Very useful if you happen to be a village; if not, not." --Gertrude Stein
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

hans castorp wrote:As I said before, I think your definition of worship is problematic. What did it mean when I said to my wife (we were married according to the 1662 English prayerbook), "With my body I thee worship"?


I don’t see why it is problematic that the word carries different semantic value in different contexts. The maximal amount of reverences and deference is relative to each subject, and shouldn’t be understood as perfect worship, but merely granting and displaying the most humility, respect, and honor one can, to God, would not anything else be idolatry?
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: For Zeez: God and Worship

Post by _bcspace »

What do all these things have in common?


Appeasement.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Post Reply