FAIR distorting the facts in UVU presentation

[_RockSlider]

Gordon is lying to the willfully ignorant masses. Gordon can not be honest with his fellow man in his claims.

Those who take it upon themselves to rationalize lying for their holy cause are pious frauds at best and exploitative scoundrels at worst.

Two more anti-mormons

[_LDS truthseeker]

Here are links to the articles were the hat is mentioned.
http://www.LDS.org/ensign/1993/07/a-treasured-testament?lang=eng&query=hat
http://www.LDS.org/ensign/1977/09/by-the-gift-and-power-of-god?lang=eng&query=hat

Is there a way to figure out which page numbers go with which articles with the online version? I'd like to verify this for myself. Not that I don't believe you, but it seems bizarre to lie about something so openly when things like this can be easily verified.

Just use the search button in Internet Explorer and search for the whole word case 'hat'. It will not show up at all in 3 of his 5 articles.

[_RockSlider]

Scratch always claims that he is anti-mopologist , not anti-Mormon.

I believe Scott will readily admit that he does not speak for the Church (nor Mormonism in general) and neither does FAIR.

If one accuses Scott of lying for the Lord, like Scratch's claim, it would seem they are anti-Scott. How does he then make the jump that the person is anti-Mormon?

John's comments in the other thread almost makes me feel sorry for these men, as they are being abandoned on all sides. With the added insult of the likes of the wolf in sheep's clothing having the ear of those whom they have battled for all these years, and they now being censored by the same.

mopologist ... the new anti-mormon

Ouch!

[_Kishkumen]

If one accuses Scott of lying for the Lord, like Scratch's claim, it would seem they are anti-Scott. How does he then make the jump that the person is anti-Mormon?

It is a hallmark of the Mopologist to identify his own ego with his vision of the LDS Church so thoroughly that any attack on him becomes an attack on the Church.

[_ldsfaqs]

Ya..... Scott Gordon is "lying"..... There just COULD NOT BE ANY OTHER EXPLANATION.....

Childish idiots!!!

[_Dr. Shades]

Ya..... Scott Gordon is "lying"..... There just COULD NOT BE ANY OTHER EXPLANATION.....

Please enlighten us, ldsfaqs. What other explanation is there other than that he's lying?

Thanks in advance.

[_Kishkumen]

I too would like to know what one is to call the misrepresentation of articles that do not mention hats as articles that do mention them.

Why all the fudging? In something as trivial as this, why stretch the claim by including items that do not actually fit?

This is exactly the kind of behavior that gives apologetics a bad name.

[_Chap]

Ya..... Scott Gordon is "lying"..... There just COULD NOT BE ANY OTHER EXPLANATION.....

Please enlighten us, ldsfaqs. What other explanation is there other than that he's lying?

Thanks in advance.

The explanation is that ... umm ...







You're cherry-picking quotations!!!

Yeah, that's nailed those anti-Mormons. Oh sorry, forgot: !!!!!!!!

[_Cylon]

LOL! You bump a 2 month old thread to throw out an insult and not even give any alternative explanation for your objection? Bizarre.

[_SteelHead]

LOL! You bump a 2 month old thread to throw out an insult and not even give any alternative explanation for your objection? Bizarre.

You will soon learn why faqs is the number two most often ignored contributor on the board.