Kishkumen wrote:I have to say it is pretty breathtaking to see how quickly they start tossing GAs overboard in order to maintain their apologetic-oriented worldview.
Meh; they've been throwing dead GAs under the bus for decades; I suppose it was inevitable that they'd eventually graduate to throwing living GAs under the bus, too.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
This all makes sense if one remembers Shades's observation from years ago: MDD is really about defending apologists, not the church.
So has anyone over there noticed that DCP and the other MI associated apologists have been lying for years as well? Or do those lies go completely unnoticed?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Dr. Shades wrote:Meh; they've been throwing dead GAs under the bus for decades; I suppose it was inevitable that they'd eventually graduate to throwing living GAs under the bus, too.
Yeah, but, theologically speaking, ignoring dead GAs is consistent with LDS teachings; throwing living ones under the bus? Not so much.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
beastie wrote:This all makes sense if one remembers Shades's observation from years ago: MDD is really about defending apologists, not the church.
Yes, indeed. It is just amazing to me to pause and reflect on all of the anger aimed at people like you and me because defending apologetics became synonymous with defending Mormonism, and, for this moment at least, seems almost to have eclipsed defending the Church itself.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
