sock puppet wrote:How did JFS know that they weren't just brain farts?
I guess if a good Methodist could have a brain fart then so could he
sock puppet wrote:How did JFS know that they weren't just brain farts?
Stormy Waters wrote:son of Ishmael wrote:"On page 99 of the same volume Joseph F. Smith stated: 'I have NEVER PRETENDED TO NOR DO I PROFESS TO HAVE RECEIVED REVELATIONS.'
How have I never heard of this?
As a member I was certainly lead to believe these men were getting more than 'any good Methodist.' Damn liars.
sock puppet wrote:
Hey, son of Ishmael, what was the date of JFS' testimony? Has that been compared to his GC talks that pre-dated that testimony? I wonder if JFS was willing to tell Congress the mental impressions 'just as an good methodist' after he had proclaimed in GC having received revelations.
son of Ishmael wrote:The Reed Smoot hearings were from 1904-1907. I am not sure when JFS's testimony was given. It would be interesting to see what kind of comments he made during conferences and talks about him being a prophet
Stormy Waters wrote:son of Ishmael wrote:The Reed Smoot hearings were from 1904-1907. I am not sure when JFS's testimony was given. It would be interesting to see what kind of comments he made during conferences and talks about him being a prophet
From these two sources it appears to be March 2, 1904
http://signaturebooks.com/2010/10/excer ... -on-trial/
http://probationarystate.blogspot.com/2 ... ny-of.html
Mr. Worthington. What was the last revelation that came to the church from the one authorized to give it as the law of the church?
Mr. Smith. Well, according to my best recollection, it must have been about 1882. The purport of the revelation was calling to the apostolate or apostleship two men, who are named in the revelation.
Mr. Worthington. Who was the president through whom that revelation came?
Mr. Smith. President John Taylor.
Mr. Worthington. You say that was the last one?
Mr. Smith. I do not now recall any since then except the manifesto.
Mr. Worthington. Except the manifesto?
Mr. Smith. Yes, except the manifesto.
Mr. Worthington. Then do I understand you to say the only revelation that has come to the church in the last twenty years is the one that says polygamy shall stop?
Mr. Smith. Since 1882?
Mr. Worthington. Yes, since 1882 - twenty-one years.
Mr. Smith. Yes, sir; I think it is.
sock puppet wrote:The next day (day 3 of the testimony), 3/3/1904:Mr. Worthington. What was the last revelation that came to the church from the one authorized to give it as the law of the church?
Mr. Smith. Well, according to my best recollection, it must have been about 1882. The purport of the revelation was calling to the apostolate or apostleship two men, who are named in the revelation.
Mr. Worthington. Who was the president through whom that revelation came?
Mr. Smith. President John Taylor.
Mr. Worthington. You say that was the last one?
Mr. Smith. I do not now recall any since then except the manifesto.
Mr. Worthington. Except the manifesto?
Mr. Smith. Yes, except the manifesto.
Mr. Worthington. Then do I understand you to say the only revelation that has come to the church in the last twenty years is the one that says polygamy shall stop?
Mr. Smith. Since 1882?
Mr. Worthington. Yes, since 1882 - twenty-one years.
Mr. Smith. Yes, sir; I think it is.
Madison54 wrote:Does anyone know which church president was most likely the last one to know the true church history (until recently)?
Themis wrote:Madison54 wrote:Does anyone know which church president was most likely the last one to know the true church history (until recently)?
Joseph Smith. All others came after and are converts to the church except when we get to the point that they started to be from children growing up in the church. No later church president was there when Joseph started his religion, so none of them would have been involved in the scam.
son of Ishmael wrote:
I guess to me the bigger questions is what do the leaders know and when did they know it.