
Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11938
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!


Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
The Holy Sacrament.
The Holy Sacrament.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9070
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
zeezrom wrote:It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!
Oh my GOD! That is gorg!!!
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 810
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:59 am
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
She is absolutely not wearing them in the tarmac picture!
Having had her calling and election made sure, she would get a free pass on wearing garments and the like. The second anointed inner circle have a completely different set of rules. They just have to appear like the are conforming in some fashion, so the masses don't twig that there is a church within a church.
Having had her calling and election made sure, she would get a free pass on wearing garments and the like. The second anointed inner circle have a completely different set of rules. They just have to appear like the are conforming in some fashion, so the masses don't twig that there is a church within a church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
She might be symbolically wearing the garment. Commando for the Lord.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:27 am
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
just me wrote:Jason Bourne wrote:She could have had then on with the dress she wore on the Leno show but unless he really hiked them up witht this one it is pretty clear she is not wearing them.
I concur.
Me three.
On one hand, I don't give a rat's ass. On the other, I find blatant hypocrisy among judgey religious types to be pretty disgusting.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:37 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
I say good for her! I wish I hadn't been so strict in the garment department when I was a TBM.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9589
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.
In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery
In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith
We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
Joseph Smith
We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
why me wrote:Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.
In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery
Here's the photo from the link in the OP:

Here's the photo from the link why me is referencing (although it's not image 5, but image 13. Image 5 is a diptych of both candidates hugging their wives):

What is the difference?
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:07 am
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
why me wrote:Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.
In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery
This is photo 5 I get from Whyme's link
Photo 5 ends at her hips, there is no way to tell how long the dress is.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm
Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...
Thanks café crema. As you can see from my post above, why me has the image # wrong. Also wrong is his assertion that the skirt in the second link is any longer than the skirt in the first link or is a doctored photo.
Can I get 10 more witnesses to this?
Can I get 10 more witnesses to this?
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."