Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _zeezrom »

It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!

Image
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _just me »

zeezrom wrote:It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!

Image


Oh my GOD! That is gorg!!!
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Spanner
_Emeritus
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:59 am

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _Spanner »

She is absolutely not wearing them in the tarmac picture!

Having had her calling and election made sure, she would get a free pass on wearing garments and the like. The second anointed inner circle have a completely different set of rules. They just have to appear like the are conforming in some fashion, so the masses don't twig that there is a church within a church.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _moksha »

She might be symbolically wearing the garment. Commando for the Lord.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_angsty
_Emeritus
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:27 am

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _angsty »

just me wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:She could have had then on with the dress she wore on the Leno show but unless he really hiked them up witht this one it is pretty clear she is not wearing them.


I concur.


Me three.

On one hand, I don't give a rat's ass. On the other, I find blatant hypocrisy among judgey religious types to be pretty disgusting.
_luc
_Emeritus
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _luc »

I say good for her! I wish I hadn't been so strict in the garment department when I was a TBM.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _why me »

Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _Blixa »

why me wrote:Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery


Here's the photo from the link in the OP:
Image

Here's the photo from the link why me is referencing (although it's not image 5, but image 13. Image 5 is a diptych of both candidates hugging their wives):
Image

What is the difference?
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_cafe crema
_Emeritus
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:07 am

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _cafe crema »

why me wrote:Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery

This is photo 5 I get from Whyme's link
Image


Photo 5 ends at her hips, there is no way to tell how long the dress is.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

Post by _Blixa »

Thanks café crema. As you can see from my post above, why me has the image # wrong. Also wrong is his assertion that the skirt in the second link is any longer than the skirt in the first link or is a doctored photo.

Can I get 10 more witnesses to this?
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
Post Reply