Ann Romney, still not wearing the Lord's pants...

[_zeezrom]

It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!

[_just me]

It would be even better to see that dress with bright pink or magenta. I *love* off-white and bright pink!

Oh my GOD! That is gorg!!!

[_Spanner]

She is absolutely not wearing them in the tarmac picture!

Having had her calling and election made sure, she would get a free pass on wearing garments and the like. The second anointed inner circle have a completely different set of rules. They just have to appear like the are conforming in some fashion, so the masses don't twig that there is a church within a church.

[_moksha]

She might be symbolically wearing the garment. Commando for the Lord.

[_angsty]

She could have had then on with the dress she wore on the Leno show but unless he really hiked them up witht this one it is pretty clear she is not wearing them.

I concur.

Me three.

On one hand, I don't give a rat's ass. On the other, I find blatant hypocrisy among judgey religious types to be pretty disgusting.

[_luc]

I say good for her! I wish I hadn't been so strict in the garment department when I was a TBM.

[_why me]

Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery

[_Blixa]

Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery

Here's the photo from the link in the OP:


Here's the photo from the link why me is referencing (although it's not image 5, but image 13. Image 5 is a diptych of both candidates hugging their wives):


What is the difference?

[_cafe crema]

Not to be a party pooper but it does look like this is a doctored photo. The legs and the body don't seem to go. But that could just be the angle of the picture. But it is something to consider.

In this photo, the skirt seems much longer. Go to image 5.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-p ... otogallery

This is photo 5 I get from Whyme's link



Photo 5 ends at her hips, there is no way to tell how long the dress is.

[_Blixa]

Thanks café crema. As you can see from my post above, why me has the image # wrong. Also wrong is his assertion that the skirt in the second link is any longer than the skirt in the first link or is a doctored photo.

Can I get 10 more witnesses to this?