"weaker sicker weaker sicker gobble waddle gobble waddle."
Is this true because of the chiasmus-like quality of this message to Dr. Peterson?
"weaker sicker weaker sicker gobble waddle gobble waddle."
While listening to the multi-person presentation introducing ScripturePlus, I received an important anonymous communication from an avid reader of Dr. Shades’s Peterson Obsession Board:
disgusting dishonest creepy waddlin simp nigglin. betcha little granddaughter gonna be proud a her fatula
Plainly, the deliberations at the Obsession Board often inspire him to share his deepest thoughts with me. This was his twelfth note to me over the past ten days. Admittedly, not all of them have been so articulate or so family-friendly — though one of Monday’s communications came pretty close:
I have a question wrote:So, instead of paying attention to the presentation he's attending, he's checking (constantly?) his phone/tablet/laptop for e mails. He's had 12 such offensive e mails in 10 days, but hasn't blocked the sender or simply deleted the e mails without reading them.
I conclude that Peterson is happy to receive such e mails, and wants to continue receiving them. Why else would someone not only continually allow such e mails into his inbox, but also advertise to the perpetrator that he's reading them, and interrupting other activities to do so? The lady doth protest too much, methinks...the emails (whether real or otherwise) are serving Peterson too well for him to consider taking the really simple actions necessary to put a stop to them. In fact, I feel I'm not setting Peterson a good example by paying attention to a thread about him in the first place. Perhaps I should be ignoring him and any threads about him. Food for thought. /$0.02
disgusting dishonest creepy waddlin simp nigglin. betcha little granddaughter gonna be proud a her fatula
...
yer a pus filled boil spewin nutzo cultist propaganda fer lemming consumption ya nasty [obscenity deleted] livin the cult fantasy lie