John Gee wrote:To spot it as an anachronism, one would have to take the Book of Abraham seriously as an ancient text, which most critics are unwilling to do. The purpose of this article is to discuss the apparent anachronism and why it is not one.
I do NOT take the Book of Abraham seriously as an ancient text. Why? Because it isn't historical ancient text. How so? Just look at the Explanations tendered by Joseph Smith in the Times and Seasons (1842) in how he gave translations and interpretations for the hieroglyphic writing in Facsimile No. 3. Therein is fraud and anachronisms galore. Therein was the nose chopped off the Egyptian god Anubis who is falsely labeled a slave by the fictitious name of Olimlah.
It's all lies, just as you are a liar, Mr. John Gee. You should be ashamed of yourself for the garbage you peddle. You're peddler of cheap wares and a liar down to the bone. History will not be kind to you. Your name will figure prominently as a traitor and an enemy to the ancient Egyptians.