Reliability of Witness Testimony

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10555
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by Res Ipsa »

huckelberry wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 4:02 pm
Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 1:05 am
We know that eyewitness evidence is unreliable and that juries think that it’s the most reliable type of evidence. And, the defense lawyers can’t inform the jury of that.
Res Ipsa, I would imagine (a question implied here) that a defense lawyer might observe how little familiarity a witness has with the accused and how other people likely have similar appearances.

I think the Book of Mormon witness have different limitation than those a witness identifying a individual in a crime has. For the Book of Mormon witness they simply had no way of knowing if the thing they were shown had the book written on them or if it was from ancient people.
It’s not just eyewitness identification that is unreliable. It’s eyewitness testimony in general.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.

Benjamin Franklin
doubtingthomas
God
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:04 pm

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by doubtingthomas »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 7:39 pm

It’s not just eyewitness identification that is unreliable. It’s eyewitness testimony in general.
Just don't tell feminists that, or they'll eat you alive. :lol:
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus. :roll:
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3046
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by huckelberry »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 7:39 pm
huckelberry wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 4:02 pm
Res Ipsa, I would imagine (a question implied here) that a defense lawyer might observe how little familiarity a witness has with the accused and how other people likely have similar appearances.

I think the Book of Mormon witness have different limitation than those a witness identifying a individual in a crime has. For the Book of Mormon witness they simply had no way of knowing if the thing they were shown had the book written on them or if it was from ancient people.
It’s not just eyewitness identification that is unreliable. It’s eyewitness testimony in general.
Res Ipsa , I can imagine a number of ways in which memory or assessment of witnesses could be misleadingly inaccurate. I was wondering about how much limitation a defense attorney must work with regards pointing that out. Is the attorney limited to pointing to contradictory evidence and leaving the jury to juggle the problem?
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10555
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by Res Ipsa »

huckelberry wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:07 pm
Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 7:39 pm


It’s not just eyewitness identification that is unreliable. It’s eyewitness testimony in general.
Res Ipsa , I can imagine a number of ways in which memory or assessment of witnesses could be misleadingly inaccurate. I was wondering about how much limitation a defense attorney must work with regards pointing that out. Is the attorney limited to pointing to contradictory evidence and leaving the jury to juggle the problem?
You can refer to contradictory evidence, impeach with contradictory evidence, refer to the age of the recollection, point out conditions at the time that weren’t conducive to accurate observation (like time of day, weather, lighting conditions, length of observation, distractions, etc). You can’t put on expert testimony about the general unreliability of eyewitness testimony.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.

Benjamin Franklin
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3046
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by huckelberry »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:35 pm
huckelberry wrote:
Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:07 pm

Res Ipsa , I can imagine a number of ways in which memory or assessment of witnesses could be misleadingly inaccurate. I was wondering about how much limitation a defense attorney must work with regards pointing that out. Is the attorney limited to pointing to contradictory evidence and leaving the jury to juggle the problem?
You can refer to contradictory evidence, impeach with contradictory evidence, refer to the age of the recollection, point out conditions at the time that weren’t conducive to accurate observation (like time of day, weather, lighting conditions, length of observation, distractions, etc). You can’t put on expert testimony about the general unreliability of eyewitness testimony.
Thankyou for the clarification Res Ipsa. That was what I was wondering about.
User avatar
Morley
God
Posts: 1980
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm
Location: 2023 National Medal of the Arts recipient, Mark Bradford's painting: Gatekeeper (2019)

Re: Reliability of Witness Testimony

Post by Morley »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Aug 11, 2022 7:39 pm
It’s not just eyewitness identification that is unreliable. It’s eyewitness testimony in general.
doubtingthomas wrote:
Sun Aug 14, 2022 7:51 pm
Just don't tell feminists that, or they'll eat you alive. : lol:

wtf
Post Reply