Mopologetics and book burning

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: Mopologetics and book burning

Post by Doctor Scratch »

Lem wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 8:41 pm
Doctor Scratch wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 7:16 pm
I don't disagree, Dean Robbers, and in fact I think your ideas are supported by the fact that, e.g., Dr. Peterson never seems to read beyond pg. 20 of whatever book he happens to be using to hit his word count on "SeN."
I would only slightly disagree. It seems that after we pointed out that his quotes all ranged from pages iii to 20, he started opening books in the middle, and quote mined from there. Every book he mentions still only includes quotes from about a 6 page range, and are inevitably all found on some "quotes from books" reference site, so I don't know who he thinks is fooled by that. :roll:
LOL. A fair point. The plagiarism really speaks volumes about the lack of respect for knowledge and original thinking.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Mopologetics and book burning

Post by Gadianton »

Dr. Moore wrote:My one gripe with your analogy is the carrots. If [carrot] "juice" was the product, then Nibley wasn't stuffing carrots, but all manner of carrot-shaped things, into his juicer.
I can't disagree with you there, Doctor, although I'm also thinking about this on Mormonism's own terms. Even if it's true, and God put the carrots where Nibley found them, and they are real carrots, it doesn't detract from the point that the library is superfluous. As soon as revelation is on the table, and assuming revelation is the center of everything, it becomes a blackhole, especially if it is actually revelation.

As for the quote, it turns up in skeptic circles here and there; thanks to Chap (and then Reverend K) for adding some context. The full quote from Rousseau makes the point that had it been a Christian at the library, the result would have been the same.
We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have. They get rid of some of the people who have been there for 25 years and they work great and then you throw them out and they're replaced by criminals.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Mopologetics and book burning

Post by Gadianton »

AZCaesar wrote:
Wed May 12, 2021 8:02 pm
I feel we are all overlooking the most important question stemming from the OP, and that is: what kind of Scotch?
Cutty Sark.
We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have. They get rid of some of the people who have been there for 25 years and they work great and then you throw them out and they're replaced by criminals.
Post Reply