beastie wrote:Beastie, all we were talking about was different versions of reality. If you can say that Joseph Smith was delusional because he had visions, etc., it ought to be fair to turn it around and at least say people are denying reality (and I never said delusional) ifr Joseph's visions were real.
Once again. I try so hard to be patient with you even when it seems that you are deliberately avoiding the issue, and even when you engage in silly diversions, like having a fit over my use of the word "delusion" (which we all know is so starkly different than "living in one's own concocted world.")
By your own admission, faith is necessary for belief. The reason faith is necessary is because there is a lack of empirical evidence. Lacking empirical evidence, no one can be accused of being crazy or "living in a concocted world" for not believing in something that can only be believed in with faith.
I will say once again, because you don't read my posts very carefully, that I NEVER said people who didn't believe Joseph Smith were crazy. They are living in denial IF Joseph Smith really had visions and revelations. And it really doesn't matter what the reason is they deny. Some people don't believe in angels at all. Some people believe in angels, but don't believe Joseph ever saw one. Some people believe in angels and that while Joseph may have seen one, he fell from grace in 1831 and everything after that was bunk. The reason isn't important.
IF Joseph was really a prophet from 1819 until his death, then those people who refuse to accept the TRUTH are denying reality.
When you get on the other side, you can pick which one to use for your defense. I, myself, would suggest you throw yourself on the mercy of the court. God is all knowing. He will know the truth from all the rationalizations. I plan on doing that when I am confronted with all my imperfections at the judgement bar.