Daniel Peterson wrote:If you really want him here, you can invite him every bit as easily as I can. His publicly-available e-mail address is william_hamblin@BYU.edu.
I went ahead and invited Bill Hamblin here, but unfortunately he declined.
Oh well, I tried.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:I went ahead and invited Bill Hamblin here, but unfortunately he declined.
Oh well, I tried.
I'm so surprised.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Daniel Peterson wrote:If you really want him here, you can invite him every bit as easily as I can. His publicly-available e-mail address is william_hamblin@BYU.edu.
I went ahead and invited Bill Hamblin here, but unfortunately he declined.
Oh well, I tried.
Why did you invite "Bill Hamblin" instead of MorgbotX or Christodoulos? Duh.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Daniel Peterson wrote:I'm not. He's had the good judgment to do what I ought to do.
I think he's maybe just too chicken? Or maybe he just doesn't want to play second fiddle to your first chair here? Or maybe he knows he'd get his head, or assorted other pieces of his anatomy, handed to him? Or maybe, just maybe, he's not as brave as you, Daniel. He's maybe realized that he's just not Alma material.
.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Daniel Peterson wrote:If you really want him here, you can invite him every bit as easily as I can. His publicly-available e-mail address is william_hamblin@BYU.edu.
I went ahead and invited Bill Hamblin here, but unfortunately he declined.
Oh well, I tried.
Dr. Shades:
Did you tell Prof. Hamblin that his stature as an apologist is crumbling on a daily basis thanks to our criticism? I think if he was made aware of how many "beatings" he has taken so far, he might want to show up to defend himself.
Gadianton wrote:Why did you invite "Bill Hamblin" instead of MorgbotX or Christodoulos? Duh.
Heh. Or perhaps I should've invited Taghribardi.
Mister Scratch wrote:Did you tell Prof. Hamblin that his stature as an apologist is crumbling on a daily basis thanks to our criticism?
Rather than tell you, it would be more effective to show you. Here is the FULL TEXT of the e-mail I sent him:
Dr. Shades wrote:Dear Dr. Hamblin,
Daniel Peterson and several critics are talking about you over at MormonDiscussions.com. He suggested that we invite you there so you can speak for yourself. Therefore, please consider this an official invitation.
The full text of my response, in turn, to him was:
Dr. Shades wrote:That's too bad. Oh well, happy trails to you.
So there you have it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:Here, likewise, is the full text of his response:
Bill Hamblin wrote:No thanks.
The full text of my response, in turn, to him was:
Dr. Shades wrote:That's too bad. Oh well, happy trails to you.
So there you have it.
Wow, what a weenie. by the way: I have just posted a new thread which may help some to better understand Hamblin's reluctance to participate here. It seems that he, far more than DCP, stands to benefit from the draconian protective policies at the aptly named MADboard. Hamblin's history of polemical violence is quite embarrassing, imho. No wonder he wants to hide.
harmony wrote:I think he's maybe just too chicken? Or maybe he just doesn't want to play second fiddle to your first chair here? Or maybe he knows he'd get his head, or assorted other pieces of his anatomy, handed to him? Or maybe, just maybe, he's not as brave as you, Daniel. He's maybe realized that he's just not Alma material.
No. He uses his time better than I use mine.
Mister Scratch wrote:Did you tell Prof. Hamblin that his stature as an apologist is crumbling on a daily basis thanks to our criticism?
