From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Simon Belmont

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Madison54 wrote:You must be referring to Will Schryver's posts. And yes, unfortunately I have read his posts. You are right about them being even more disgusting that Pahoran's. But that still doesn't excuse Pahoran's rude posts.


I am referring to posters like Joseph, Polygamy Porter, CamNC4Me, The Mighty Builder, etc.

Does this, for example, strike you as kind?

antishock8/CamNC4Me wrote:

Your message is fine. It's worth discussing, but you're leaving out the FACT that woman are straight BITCHES toward people. f*****g BITCHES. But their worst vitirol is reserved for each other. They are unbelieveable toward one another. A level of toxicity I've never seen men get to. f***, if men get to just 50% of the s*** women talk about each other someone is getting shot or beat to death. I've been on both sides of their b***s***, and if you've ever worked or interacted with them on an extended basis the pedestal we men tend to put them on is destroyed by them.

If the women of this board don't want to post here because they're being little drama llamas, or playing the victim card... Whatever. That's on them. They'll just find some other avenue to vent their s***. If they want to stick to the issues, and address the issues... Then fine. Do it. They reap what they sow, too. If they can't see that, and want to, yet again, not take responsibility for their own actions then that's that. It's typical. The women who stick around have my respect, but it's the same kind of respect I would give anyone who sticks around. It take strength to stay on a board that has minimal moderation. Apparently, there are quite a few that lack that kind of courage.




antishock8/CamNC4Me wrote:

Oh, my! What a dumb c***!


In your anger for Mormonism, Madison, you are too blind to see the blatant assholery of your tribesmen.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Pahoran wrote:
MsJack wrote:Hi Simon,

You're welcome to round up these examples from antishock8/DoctorCamNC4Me and harmony, do a post about them, and see whether or not we don't care about them. I'm personally not familiar with the examples in question.

But MsJack: why would anyone do that? What kind of person gets their vindictive jollies by going to the trouble of trolling through hundreds of posts going back years in order to mine juicy little tidbits for the purpose of going after an individual?

Regards,
Pahoran


It's been done, Pahoran. The current opposition to WS's treatment of women on this board isn't the first time this type of thing has been addressed.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Simon Belmont

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Jersey Girl wrote:Look Belmont,

You've been on this board about 5 minutes compared to the rest of us. You are wrong in your assumption that "no one cares or cared" about the language of A8 or others.

Here:http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8024&hilit=sexual+harrassment

Now shut up about it, okay?


I would love to shut up about it. I wish there were no double standards on this board -- but there are.. Most of you are happy to have a public hanging for an LDS person you don't like, but does anyone say anything about the exact same behavior from critics? Well, the answer is yes, but very rarely.

So what is to be done?
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _MsJack »

Pahoran wrote:But MsJack: why would anyone do that? What kind of person gets their vindictive jollies by going to the trouble of trolling through hundreds of posts going back years in order to mine juicy little tidbits for the purpose of going after an individual?

I articulated my concerns with William and the reasons for my thread in the OP of said thread. Honestly, you really should have read the OP of the post you were trying to critique before making all of these bad arguments against it. You'd have saved yourself some embarrassment in the process.

Besides, it was William himself who invited the members of this community to do as much, and he repeatedly demonstrated his gratitude to me in the thread in question by thanking me. Since William himself was so grateful for my efforts, I'm not sure why you're complaining.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Kishkumen »

malaise wrote:Maybe it has something to do with the fact that you are an intellectually dishonest moron. Maybe.


Bingo!
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Kishkumen »

MsJack wrote:Since William himself was so grateful for my efforts, I'm not sure why you're complaining.


Pahoran would be the first person to send the gift horse to the glue factory.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Pahoran »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Pahoran wrote:But MsJack: why would anyone do that? What kind of person gets their vindictive jollies by going to the trouble of trolling through hundreds of posts going back years in order to mine juicy little tidbits for the purpose of going after an individual?

Regards,
Pahoran

It's been done, Pahoran. The current opposition to WS's treatment of women on this board isn't the first time this type of thing has been addressed.

Well, I haven't been a very regular poster here, so I may have missed something; but the last such thread I saw had a title similar to "Will Schryver the Vulgar Scatologist." Are you saying there have been similar threads aimed at others?

If so, were any of the targets not Mormons?

Regards,
Pahoran
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Pahoran
Well, I haven't been a very regular poster here, so I may have missed something; but the last such thread I saw had a title similar to "Will Schryver the Vulgar Scatologist." Are you saying there have been similar threads aimed at others?

If so, were any of the targets not Mormons?

Regards,
Pahoran


Geez, Pahoran, I'm not up for repeating myself 500 times here. Just above the post of mine that you are responding to, is another post that I made to Belmont with a link.

Actually, I view the "targets" as the female posters to whom the original comments were directed and yes, these were non-LDS posters.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Continuing....Pahoran, I think you know me well enough to know that when confronted with that type of thing, I typically take care of it myself in any number of ways in full public view, unless the language is extremely lewd. In those cases, I might contact admin or complain to admin in full public view.

If you take a look at the Ray A. thread I linked to, that was after I'd had my fill of such remarks and simply left the board. I was not the only female poster to leave the board.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: From My Informant: Did Brian Hauglid Betray Schryver?

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

This thread as taken a turn for the stupid. Arguing that MsJack demanding Will to be held to his own religious standards should demand that non-LDS posters should be held to those standards is the kind of clear thinking that DCP used to state Heidegger is an example of anti-existentialism.
Post Reply