Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _moksha »

Dr. Shades wrote:Also, DO NOT copy-and-paste images from a commercial or proprietary website.



Does commercial mean a site that has ads like here or at The Onion, or does it mean a site that tries to sell a product like General Motors or the MAD board?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

Joseph wrote:ealison wrote: "I'd also point out that false copyright violation reports can be made about text too."
**************************

Most DMCA notices are not false. Such an ephemeral hope to hang your hat on...


Joseph,

Image
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Joseph »

Will be interesting when one of you numnuts posts the wrong image and triggers THIS coming down on your head.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NET_Act


No Electronic Theft (NET) Act


An Act to amend the provisions of titles 17 and 18, United States Code, to provide greater copyright protection by amending criminal copyright infringement provisions, and for other purposes.



Enacted by the
105th United States Congress

Effective
December 16, 1997


The United States No Electronic Theft Act (NET Act), a federal law passed in 1997, provides for criminal prosecution of individuals who engage in copyright infringement under certain circumstances, even when there is no monetary profit or commercial benefit from the infringement. Maximum penalties can be five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. The NET Act also raised statutory damages by 50%.

Prior to the enactment of the NET Act in 1997, criminal copyright infringement required that the infringement was for the purpose of "commercial advantage or private financial gain." Merely uploading and downloading files on the internet did not fulfill this requirement, meaning that even large-scale online infringement could not be prosecuted criminally.[1]

This state of affairs was underscored by the unsuccessful 1994 prosecution of David LaMacchia, then a student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for allegedly facilitating massive copyright infringement as a hobby, without any commercial motive. The court's dismissal of United States v. LaMacchia suggested that then-existing criminal law simply did not apply to non-commercial infringements (a state of affairs which became known as the "LaMacchia Loophole"). The court suggested that Congress could act to make some non-commercial infringements a crime, and Congress acted on that suggestion in the NET Act.

The NET Act amended the definition of "commercial advantage or private financial gain" to include the "receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works" (17 USC 101), and specifies penalties of up to five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. In addition, it added a threshold for criminal liability where the infringer neither obtained nor expected to obtain anything of value for the infringement – "by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $ 1,000" (17 USC 506(a)(1)(B)). In response to the NET Act, the US Sentencing Commission stiffened sanctions for intellectual property infringement.[2]
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_RayAgostini

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _RayAgostini »

Joseph wrote:We already know you are not honest. We already know you don't care if the site has problems due to your oversized ego - what shortcoming are you compensating for?


Didn't you have an avatar before? What happened to it? Did you take it down because you're afraid of looking like the true hypocrite you are? Or just afraid of "copyright issues"? lol.
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

Joseph,

You really have no understanding of copyright law. Why even try anymore?

Image
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Joseph »

yes agitator, I had an avatar. It was of me flying a crop duster. I also have in my possession written authorization to use the copyrighted image. Took it down due to threats from slime-one on appropriating photos.
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_Everybody Wang Chung
_Emeritus
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:53 am

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Everybody Wang Chung »

Joseph,

Image
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
_RayAgostini

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _RayAgostini »

Joseph wrote:yes agitator, I had an avatar. It was of me flying a crop duster. I also have in my possession written authorization to use the copyrighted image. Took it down due to threats from slime-one on appropriating photos.


Do post this "written authorisation". I'm going to check on this, and hold you to your word.
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _Joseph »

Post it to you? As soon as wingnut posts his graduation certificate, Bar Assn number, law office address & phone number and real name.

You want to see it, file the appropriate legal paperwork and I'll see you in court. With your attitude you are not trustworthy.
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_RayAgostini

Re: Poster solidarity! PICTURES NOW!

Post by _RayAgostini »

Joseph wrote:Post it to you? As soon as wingnut posts his graduation certificate, Bar Assn number, law office address & phone number and real name.

You want to see it, file the appropriate legal paperwork and I'll see you in court. With your attitude you are not trustworthy.


So if I had the right "attitude" (i.e., pro-Joseph) I'd be "trustworthy"? "Attitude" is what counts here? I see.

Tell me again why you don't have your "flying crop duster" image anymore? Even though you claim you had "written permission" to have it as your avatar.

So, you wrote for permission to post this avatar, did you?
Post Reply