Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Marcus »

Shulem wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 9:28 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 9:25 pm
When you are being disparaging towards Marcus in a post to another poster you use the terms ‘she’ and ‘her’. When you are being disparaging towards a male poster in a post to another poster you use their username. You try to diminish Marcus because Marcus is a woman. You do not do that to a poster whom you think is male. You struggle with strong-minded women in a way you do not struggle with strong-minded men. It has the hallmarks of a significantly insecure man.

Very well said.
I agree. Thank you, IHQ.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Shulem »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 9:03 pm
Shulem wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 8:38 pm
Mormons feel a sense of entitlement in referring to other religions whether ancient or current as "the whore of all the earth" ...
I feel absolutely no sense of entitlement being a member of the church.

Dance around the word entitlement but you know what I mean. Mormons claim their priesthood authority and scriptures entitles them to condemn all other religions/churches as "the whore of all the earth".

Yeah, I made my point.
User avatar
sock puppet
God
Posts: 1184
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by sock puppet »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 9:03 pm
I feel absolutely no sense of entitlement being a member of the church.
Wow. What a demonstration of MG 2.0's complete lack of self-awareness. Mormon teachings brain-wash their youth into thinking they are a special generation, most choice spirits held back to come forth in these latter days to prepare the way for the 2nd Coming. Being born in the covenant (BIC) being an especial status with God. But, of course, MG 2.0 proclaims he feels "absolutely no sense of entitlement being a member of the church." Breathtakingly un-self-aware.
"There will come a time when the rich own all the media, and it will be impossible for the public to make an informed opinion." Albert Einstein, ~1949 "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Shulem »

sock puppet wrote:
Sat Sep 20, 2025 3:13 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 9:03 pm
I feel absolutely no sense of entitlement being a member of the church.
But, of course, MG 2.0 proclaims he feels "absolutely no sense of entitlement being a member of the church." Breathtakingly un-self-aware.

MG is dancing around the word "entitlement" which is often used in a negative connotation for selfish people: "The belief that one is inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment;" which is something the church teaches members should avoid among themselves as they seek perfection. But, there is also another definition which applies to how Mormons in general compare themselves with the rest of the world and so they collectively and individually do feel entitled or have entitlement to things above and beyond what the rest of the world may rightly claim.

Dictionary:
  • The fact of having a right to something.
  • The amount to which a person has a right.

Now, with that said, it appears the Mormons think they are better than other people and deserve a higher reward because they keep certain rules and perform certain rituals. So in the end, I would think that MG expects to have a larger or fatter penis size in the resurrection compared to those in lower kingdoms. Right? Does that make sense?

Yeah. And men do tend to be hung up on penis size! I should know because I'm a gay man and know everything there is to know about penises. You can't fool me!

:lol:
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 8266
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Moksha »

Shulem wrote:
Fri Sep 19, 2025 4:15 pm
Also, the apologetic about Mormon-mother is just ego man-talk. It's mortal man's idea of how he thinks a Man-god having a Man-woman at his side behaves in front of the children. The apologetic is rather worldly, it's earthy immature He-man stuff.
What if the LDS God bounds up on stage, slapping you in the face, and tells you to keep his unnamed wife's name out of your mouth?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Shulem »

Moksha wrote:
Wed Sep 24, 2025 12:54 pm
What if the LDS God bounds up on stage....

The concept of Heavenly Father (Penis-Man-God) as taught by Mormonism is false religious doctrine and a tenet that has absolutely no bearing on me whatsoever. Frankly, it's immature and rather childish in nature and is an earthly construct of man's ideas. Smith's doctrines of God were developed out of his understanding of biblical concepts and his own desire to match God's celestial reward of having eternal sex with women.

Michelangelo's David is without question the most famous nude statue in the history of planet earth. It is a beautiful work of art and is universally accepted as a masterpiece that should be appreciated by all. It is not pornography as some might suggest. It is not rated R but is rated G. It portrays a handsome man in what is considered a perfect body.

Now, I would like to ask Heavenly Father a question:

How do your genitals compare to that of David's? Details, please.

Image
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Shulem »

Moksha wrote:
Wed Sep 24, 2025 12:54 pm
....slapping you in the face, and tells you to keep his unnamed wife's name out of your mouth?

I would slap him back.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Question for MG

Post by Shulem »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:27 am
drumdude wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:27 am
I’m just trying to be more like Joseph. Isn’t that a primary song?
Jesus.

Regards,
MG

Dear brother MG,

As you know, the Lord Jesus was circumcised on the 8th day after his birth according to Mosaic Law. I will gladly reveal :shock: that I too was circumcised shortly after birth and I would be willing to bet you were as well. Right? In other words, we were CUT! We were mutilated for Moses' sake according to customs that were prevalent at the time of our birth.

Now, with that said, let us examine another work of fine art displayed prominently in a church in Rome:

Michelangelo's naked resurrected Christ:

Image


QUESTION:

Was Jesus resurrected with or without his foreskin?

[ ] with
[ ] without
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Nelson reaffirms TK smoothie doctrine that gender is not eternal

Post by Shulem »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:27 am
Jesus.

Regards,
MG

Okay, so you don't want to discuss the resurrected penis of Jesus, I can understand that. But can we at least talk about Abraham's penis? The Bible tells us he was circumscribed when age 99 years old as a sign of God making him a father of many nations and multiplying his seed. Joseph Smith said that Abraham already sits atop a throne as an exalted god (D&C 132:29). So, I pose the same question:

Did Abraham get his foreskin back in the resurrection?

[ ] yes
[ ] no

That is a very simple question, MG. Speak up or shut up.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8858
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Father's Penis

Post by Shulem »

I tender my opinion on what I think Mormon doctrine requires with regard to Heavenly Father's penis, let alone how its size compares to his Father's (Father has a Father). Snipping the foreskin is an unnatural practice and is a mutilation of the body practiced by Jews and others here on planet earth. Its performance was a religious rite. Now with that said, we don't know if circumcision was a rite practiced on the home world in which Heavenly Father was born and raised. Was he circumcised?

<snip>

Does Heavenly Father now sport a foreskin?

[X] yes
[ ] no
Post Reply