use the on brackets [] and the off brackets [/] when quoting. Insert the word quote between the on brackets where you want to start the quote, so it looks like this: [ quote ] (minus the extra spaces). Insert the word quote between the off brackets where you want to stop the quote [ /quote ] (minus the extra spaces).
So, to quote the first line it would look like this: [ quote ] (minus the spaces before and after quote) Charity, a small lesson in quoting: [ /quote ] (minus the spaces before and after /quote). And it will look like this:
use the on brackets [] and the off brackets [/] when quoting. Insert the word quote between the on brackets where you want to start the quote, so it looks like this: [ quote ] (minus the extra spaces). Insert the word quote between the off brackets where you want to stop the quote [ /quote ] (minus the extra spaces).
So, to quote the first line it would look like this: [ quote ] (minus the spaces before and after quote) Charity, a small lesson in quoting: [ /quote ] (minus the spaces before and after /quote). And it will look like this:
Charity, a small lesson in quoting:
Or, select the text you'd like to quote, and push the "Quote" button above the composition window.
Here is my quote.
And if you want to attribute a quote, add: ="Poster Name" after [quote so that it looks like [ quote="Poster Name" ] (minus the spaces within each bracket).
Poster Name wrote:Here is my attributed quote.
Easy-peasy.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
use the on brackets [] and the off brackets [/] when quoting. Insert the word quote between the on brackets where you want to start the quote, so it looks like this: [ quote ] (minus the extra spaces). Insert the word quote between the off brackets where you want to stop the quote [ /quote ] (minus the extra spaces).
So, to quote the first line it would look like this: [ quote ] (minus the spaces before and after quote) Charity, a small lesson in quoting: [ /quote ] (minus the spaces before and after /quote). And it will look like this:
Charity, a small lesson in quoting:
Or, select the text you'd like to quote, and push the "Quote" button above the composition window.
Here is my quote.
And if you want to attribute a quote, add: ="Poster Name" after [quote so that it looks like [ quote="Poster Name" ] (minus the spaces within each bracket).
Poster Name wrote:Here is my attributed quote.
Easy-peasy.
Now we'll see if charity is openminded enough to take a lesson from the likes of us.
thestyleguy wrote:This plural marriage thingy without sex is just crazy. At about age 13 or 14 a young man's brains and heart are transfered below the belly button and it's another 60 years before they move back up to where they were at birth.
Projection, styleguy.
Yes, and heavily embedded in post sixties cultural assumptions and expectations that styleguy, depending on his age, may not even be aware of.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
harmony wrote:I know you had to have studied anthropology in your quest for your masters. Did you close your eyes and ears and go "la la la la", when anyone mentioned societies that are over 12,000 years old? Surely you know about the development of agriculture, the accumlation of wealth, the development of class strata... surely?
I can document the hunter-gatherers. Can you document Adam?
I await your reply with great anticipation.
I only took a survey of anthro class. Nothing 400 level or above. I know about hunters and gatrherers. And Lucy. I guess you haven't read much of Nibley. He has a really interesting piece about how history doesn't start until the record starts. It kind of opens you up to a flexible view of dating.
Oh, and we temple going LDS know the real way to look at the story of Adam and Eve. But it is easy to miss is you aren't listening for it. And haven't had the opportunity to go a hundreds of times. As a person has had when they are my age. You might listen next time you are there with your new temple recommend.
charity wrote:I only took a survey of anthro class. Nothing 400 level or above. I know about hunters and gatrherers. And Lucy. I guess you haven't read much of Nibley. He has a really interesting piece about how history doesn't start until the record starts. It kind of opens you up to a flexible view of dating.
Nibley had a bunch of really useless ideas, charity. That's one of them. Now... are you going to address the concept of marriage prior to when the church usurped it or not?
Oh, and we temple going LDS know the real way to look at the story of Adam and Eve. But it is easy to miss is you aren't listening for it. And haven't had the opportunity to go a hundreds of times. As a person has had when they are my age. You might listen next time you are there with your new temple recommend.
I can quote it, charity. Good grief, did you think you were the only one who could?
charity wrote:Oh, and we temple going LDS know the real way to look at the story of Adam and Eve. But it is easy to miss is you aren't listening for it. And haven't had the opportunity to go a hundreds of times. As a person has had when they are my age. You might listen next time you are there with your new temple recommend.
Wow, that was a snotty thing to say.
I'm trying to think. For 4 years in Utah I went once a week. That's somewhere about 200 times. Before that, I had gone at least monthly for about 12 years, so that's another 144 times or so. When we moved to Houston I went monthly for 3 years and weekly for two years, so that's 36 plus 104.
charity wrote:the road to hana: You are asserting that Joseph Smith had non-sexual "marriages." Why then would they be described as a marriage, and where has the principle of plural marriage ever been taught or advanced as non-sexual?
charity: Why questions are never useful unless you can ask the people involved.
That has to be one of the most amazing non-answers ever.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
charity wrote:Oh, and we temple going LDS know the real way to look at the story of Adam and Eve. But it is easy to miss is you aren't listening for it. And haven't had the opportunity to go a hundreds of times. As a person has had when they are my age. You might listen next time you are there with your new temple recommend.
Wow, that was a snotty thing to say.
I'm trying to think. For 4 years in Utah I went once a week. That's somewhere about 200 times. Before that, I had gone at least monthly for about 12 years, so that's another 144 times or so. When we moved to Houston I went monthly for 3 years and weekly for two years, so that's 36 plus 104.
200+144+36+104 = 484 times.
Maybe I wasn't listening. :rolleyes:
If we could talk in the temple, you would slap yourself on the forehead like the V-8 commerical guys. And do you recall President Kimball saying that he learned something new each time he went? It only speaks to the complexity and depth of the temple ceremony. And most of us, including me, don't listen all that well.