What I've learned from apologetics

[_Ray A]

There is no drama about it on MAD, Ray. They don't care about our Cupcake Queen there. For all I know, it's on page 3 now.

The reference was deleted here, at the request of some of our posters,who also don't seem to care diddly about our Cupcake Queen. But they were so busy defending someone named Mangoes, who we don't know from Adam. Or Cain, as the case may be.

Trigger happy. Some of us are just trigger happy.

Mangoes is Moniker. You know this, don't you?

[_harmony]

I've read it more times than I care to admit. I don't see any lie posted about KA.

then you actually think KA did what Mangoes accused her of doing? She connected KA alias the Cupcake Queen to a suicide attempt. Do you not think that's a lie?

Good God, Jersey!

[_harmony]

I want to know, harm, why you are placing more emphasis on KA than on the mental state of the poster who was described in the posts that you transferred?

1. there is no mention of Mangoes' mental state in any of the posts I transferred. I don't know who Mangoes is and I certainly don't know what her mental state is. (I am concerned about the daughter, though. That sounds potentially serious.)

2. Mangoes refers to a suicide attempt by her daughter (the only reason we know Mangoes is female is because she then goes on to mention a husband), and then proceeds to lay the blame for that deed at the feet of our cupcake queen. I take exception to that.

[_harmony]

Mangoes is Moniker. You know this, don't you?

I don't know that, and neither do you.

[_Ray A]

then you actually think KA did what Mangoes accused her of doing? She connected KA alias the Cupcake Queen to a suicide attempt. Do you not think that's a lie?

Good God, Jersey!

Who's reputation has been destroyed here? KAs, or "Ms"?

Who are you batting for? Your sense of justice seems out of sinc, Harm.

Maybe if you weren't one of "Shades' clones", you might actually think more clearly?

[_Jersey Girl]

I've read it more times than I care to admit. I don't see any lie posted about KA.

then you actually think KA did what Mangoes accused her of doing? She connected KA alias the Cupcake Queen to a suicide attempt. Do you not think that's a lie?

Good God, Jersey!

Mangoes accused her of nothing, harm.

[_harmony]

I wouldn't know about Mangoes on the other board had it not been for you bringing the post Mangoes had wanted deleted.. over to here.

And this is relevant why?

It's obvious who Mangoes is when one reads that post who brought here and the one in which she explains she didn't write it.

Some of us don't have your mindreading capacity, marg. And neither do you. You don't know who Mangoes is. And you certainly don't know whether or not she can post here.

However it is not obvious that Mangoes/M wrote the post referring to the cupcake queen. In fact it doesn't sound like it was her. It sounds like someone speaking on behalf of her, someone close, someone who is upset for a number of reasons. And there is no indication the person knows this board exists.

Well, all we have is what is posted under Mangoes' nickname. Them's the facts.

Sheesh Harmony all you had to do was admit you are wrong, or delete your stuff. At least Liz had the good sense to delete your stuff when you wouldn't.

Liz has no dog in this fight. Plus, she's a lot nicer than I am. Me, I'm not willing to admit I'm wrong, unless I think I'm wrong. And I don't. Your problem is you made assumptions and now you can't get out of them.

You know Harmony ...you are being extremely disingenuous. One reason I'm not concerned about K.A. is because she's expressed she's not concerned. K.A. can post here and speak for herself. And the person who wrote the post on MAD express some very unsettling information if true.

Ah, but KA cannot post where the accusation was made! And that's what it's all about, marg.

[_marg]

I've read it more times than I care to admit. I don't see any lie posted about KA.

then you actually think KA did what Mangoes accused her of doing? She connected KA alias the Cupcake Queen to a suicide attempt. Do you not think that's a lie?

Good God, Jersey!

I reread the note Harm and the person who used M's account did not accuse the "cupcake queen" of anything. You brought the issue here, had you not done that, none of this would have ensued. The good news is Liz deleted your uncalled for portions of your posts.

[_Ray A]

Ah, but KA cannot post where the accusation was made! And that's what it's all about, marg.

And Moniker cannot post where accusations are made against her.

Thanks to you, Harm. The Great Advocate of "free speech".

Are you now going to say, "I was only doing what I was told"?

[_harmony]

Mangoes accused her of nothing, harm.

Mangoes said her daughter attempted suicide, and in the very next sentence, brings up the cupcake queen having access to her daughter's blog... inferring that the suicide attempt was because the cupcake queen had information that was in her daughter's blog. (Not having read the blog in question, I have no idea why the two are closely connected enough to be juxtapositioned that closely, but hey... I can only go by what I see). That sounds to me like she's connected the cupcake queen to her daughter's attempted suicide.

How do you read it any other way?