Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

[_moksha]

Professor of Herpetology or some similar field. He may have discovered the relationship between hearing LDS missionaries ringing the doorbell and the final actions of thorn birds.

[_Lemmie]

Libeling Louie, libeling gemli yet again!

Louis Midgley gemli • 21 hours ago • edited

One can see why even atheist gave him the boot from some blog or board, after the New York Times prevented him from posting comments.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 5032924430

[_Philo Sofee]

Dr. Exiled
But Coach believes he knows how to control the narrative better than the brethren, I guess.

The crazy thing is, Peterson actually is heads and tails more intelligent than any Mormon GA has been in the last 60 years! But for whatever reason he allows lesser, inferior men to dictate to him what conclusions he is allowed to arrive at in Mormon research.......just positively weird when that finally sinks in for real. This ain't the power in the priesthood be upon my loins for time and for all eternity, this is the power of money.

[_Temp. Admin.]

You don't think he prefers to arrive at those conclusions anyway, regardless of what any Mormon G.A. might say?

[_moksha]

Louis Midgley gemli • 21 hours ago • edited

... after the New York Times prevented him from posting comments.

What is this about? I could see the Times being cautious with Midgley due to libel concerns, but Gemli? Is Dr. Midgley hallucinating?

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Whoah. Wait. Woah. That doesn't look right. Whoa. <- That's sounds like Hoo-Ah. I dunno.

Wow. It looks like Moanin' Louis "peckerhead" Midgley is agitating for the genial Moksha's removal from Sick and None:

"Loopy Louis Midgley > Daniel "dowsing" Peterson

I must urge you to clean up your blog by giving Moksha at least six months in the Sin Bin to reconsider his way of commenting our sic et non. The reason is that he must be striving to entertain the rabble on a certain other place on the internet with his remarks."

What could possible aggravate the Lounatic to the point of him demanding that Daniel "pandemic" Peterson remove him from the vanity blog?

It appears Moksha made the grave error of being friendly to gemli with an innocuous comment about hecklers:

"Moksha > gemli

Junior hecklers on this blog are only allowed a limited number of lines. That would explain Ideeho's constant Zzzzzzzzz."

- Doc

[_Lemmie]

Louis Midgley tavs 3 hours ago

I just read a second time that list of "few of the dehumanizing insults" that, according to Tavs/Charles, Professor Peterson has "allowed" me to use. I noticed the word "louse" in that list. The fact is that I had to do a Google search to find out what that word sometimes means. I don't think that I have used any of those labels to describe gemli.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 5038997183

Also Midgley, July 2020:

Louis Midgley gemli • 4 hours ago • edited

...is gemli perhaps a type two diabetic, since he has "to watch [his] sugar intake? Why would a mere cockroach care about such a thing? Or a mere soon to be decaying "meat wad"?

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 5006630269

:rolleyes:

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

So, apparently Dowsin’ Daniel Peterson and Louis “peckerhead” Midgley are upset people have noted they’ve been using meat wad and cockroach as pejoratives, even going as far as blaming gemli for it since he used the terms topically once or twice. The Lounatic moaned out this complaint:

“Louis Midgley > DanielPeterson

The Peterson hate Board has, it seems, been looking for anything to discredit me, except engaging anything I have published, except by calling me a "creepy stalker," and so forth and so on. Those folks seem either incapable or determined not to engage arguments and evidence. Instead they do exactly what tavs has just done. Professor Peterson is right about my having a fondness for gemli. And I have never once thought that gemli should be given the boot. gemli, unlike those who have migrated to sic et non from the Peterson hate board, has never shown the hatred that some who come here to justify to apostasy to both themselves and others.”

We’re literally “engaging anything I published” when you publish your comments on a public blog for public consumption you raving lounatic.

Also, I never felt so much hatred for anyone that I’ve kept dossiers on them, or went to a bookstore and handed the proprietor information that would result in them removing an ‘enemy’s’ books, or travel across the world to creepily hang out with a spouse of an apostate, or write endless hate-filled reviews of books I don’t like, or ask that someone be booted from a forum because I don’t like their opinions.

Why are mopologists so oblivious and project the worst of themselves onto others?

- Doc

[_Philo Sofee]

Doc4cam
We’re literally “engaging anything I published” when you publish your comments on a public blog for public consumption you raving lounatic.

No, he means "real" publishing like in Interpreter...

[_Doctor Scratch]

Doc4cam
We’re literally “engaging anything I published” when you publish your comments on a public blog for public consumption you raving lounatic.

No, he means "real" publishing like in Interpreter...

Interestingly, the comments at "SeN" are also usually "peer reviewed," much in the same way that articles are "peer reviewed" at Interpreter.