Getting "Comped," Mopologetic Style?

[_Mister Scratch]

Maklelan, I hate to point this out to you, but this last sentence of yours doesn't quite make sense. This needs to be pointed out to you because you rather condescendingly ordered Gadianton to "learn to spell."

I knew you'd make my decision that much easier. You guys never fail. Later.

Maklelan, are you kidding me? Do I need to quote your post for you? Your hypocrisy really is staggering. I'll just say this: if you can't take it, then don't dish it out.

In any case, I'm sure that the real reason you're leaving is that you have been placed in the position of having to either confess your hypocrisy, or else demonstrating, via your lack of contrition, that in face *you* are driven by vanity and pride. What a sad exposure of yet another young Mopologist!

[_gramps]

Maklellan is always running from threads.

(Still waiting over on the SMAC thread, as well, Mak.)

[_antishock8]

I'm not expecting any evidence, LoaP. You see, when the chips are down, Mopologists always refuse to provide evidence. This is true in the case of the 2nd Watson Letter, and the mysterious Signature Books "memo."

I still have not received a response to my inquiry reference the "2nd Watson Letter".

I don't think it existed. In typical Mopologetic fashion it was a lie in order to expedite their "truth".

[_antishock8]

BLAIR.

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR LOLZ!!!!!!!!!!111

[_LifeOnaPlate]

Really? LoaP asked for an apology for a past offense and I happily offered one up. Of course, he proceeded to spit in my face after wards, but you can't accuse me of not trying.

Misdirection, red herrings, tu quoque, meaningless. Typical fare. As anyone can see I thanked you for your apology and pointed out that given its wording it could be construed as sarcasm. I wouldn't call that a spit in he face by any stretch. But again, the Scratchian hyperbole goes on.

Anyways, sure I would have, Mak. You didn't present any evidence beyond your very subjective personal testimony, though. I found that hypocritical, given how often you have harped on the notion of "objectivity" in this thread. Will you concede that you have behaved hypocritically? I rather doubt it.

I hope he doesn't concede such a thing because it's a patently false allegation.

What "suspicion"? That DCP was "comped" this book due to being a Mopologist? Well, Maklelan, I never "suspected" that that was the case! I *wondered* if it might be, but, thanks to you, I think we can now lay that "wonderment" to rest.

Again, you attempted to use this instance to smear Peterson, admitted such, and then proceeded to dissemble.

Really? What do you want me to concede? I'm a humble chap---I'll gladly do it. You're wrong about me, by the way: I don't have anything against you. Will you concede that you're wrong about it?

You have something against those who defend Dan Peterson. As maklelan was so doing, you were so holding against.

Sure, Mak. I'd be glad to. What is it that you want me to concede? That DCP's status as a Mopologist played no role whatsoever in his receiving a discount on the book? Well...okay. I don't know that that is 100% the case, but if it will help you to view me in a less hateful light, then sure: I happily concede.

What was the purpose of this thread, and what was its conclusion?

[_LifeOnaPlate]

Maklellan is always running from threads.

(Still waiting over on the SMAC thread, as well, Mak.)

Oh, brother. If this is the sort of nonsense you're going to implicitly defend (Scratch's asinine and inane conspiracy nonsense) then I have misjudged you.

[_LifeOnaPlate]

BLAIR.

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR LOLZ!!!!!!!!!!111

uh...hysterical?

[_gramps]

Maklellan is always running from threads.

(Still waiting over on the SMAC thread, as well, Mak.)

Oh, brother. If this is the sort of nonsense you're going to implicitly defend (Scratch's asinine and inane conspiracy nonsense) then I have misjudged you.

Maklellan does run from threads. Just like you are running from the first vision thread now.

You don't know me from Adam. There is no reason to judge or misjudge me, really.

I have made no comments on this thread, other than to prod Maklellan. I don't see how my saying Maklellan runs from threads shows any implicit support of Scratch. Scratch is Scratch. I am not Scratch.

Maklellan nearly always ends up pouting, just like in his avatar, and then runs off.

[_LifeOnaPlate]

Maklellan does run from threads. Just like you are running from the first vision thread now.

You don't know me from Adam. There is no reason to judge or misjudge me, really.

I have made no comments on this thread, other than to prod Maklellan. I don't see how my saying Maklellan runs from threads shows any implicit support of Scratch. Scratch is Scratch. I am not Scratch.

Maklellan nearly always ends up pouting, just like in his avatar, and then runs off.

He's not running away. Good grief. He has amply demonstrated, as have others in the thread, that Scratch's statements here are void of substance. He's running away from nothing. Don't be a fool. I can only judge you so far as communicating with you online is concerned. You are making that judgment easier all the time.

[_gramps]

Maklellan does run from threads. Just like you are running from the first vision thread now.

You don't know me from Adam. There is no reason to judge or misjudge me, really.

I have made no comments on this thread, other than to prod Maklellan. I don't see how my saying Maklellan runs from threads shows any implicit support of Scratch. Scratch is Scratch. I am not Scratch.

Maklellan nearly always ends up pouting, just like in his avatar, and then runs off.

He's not running away. Good grief. He has amply demonstrated, as have others in the thread, that Scratch's statements here are void of substance. He's running away from nothing. Don't be a fool. I can only judge you so far as communicating with you online is concerned. You are making that judgment easier all the time.

He sure ran away quick from the SMAC thread. And he will soon disappear from the temple thread as well I would bet.

Don't be too quick to judge who is the fool and who isn't, LOAP. =)