The "Final Solution"?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Stormy Waters

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Stormy Waters »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote:
Also remember that damning information was intentionally withheld. If I had been told the whole truth up front, then I might agree with your statement.


To which damning information do you refer?


This

This is also the presentation that he gave. He was a CES institute director and he explains it pretty well.
_Yoda

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Yoda »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote:
Also remember that damning information was intentionally withheld. If I had been told the whole truth up front, then I might agree with your statement.


To which damning information do you refer?

I believe that Stormy Waters is referring to a lot of the Church history that has been misrepresented or "buried" rather than taught outright.

The fact that Joseph Smith married other men's wives was something that was unknown to me until several years ago, and I have spent over 40 years as a member of the Church. That is but one example.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Stormy Waters wrote:
Also remember that damning information was intentionally withheld. If I had been told the whole truth up front, then I might agree with your statement.


Jersey Girl wrote:To which damning information do you refer?


Stormy Waters wrote:This

This is also the presentation that he gave. He was a CES institute director and he explains it pretty well.


Come on, Stormy. Even Packham admits the following:

Here is a summary of important facts about the Mormon church, its doctrine, and its history that the missionaries will probably not tell you. We are not suggesting that they are intentionally deceiving you --most of the young Mormons serving missions for the church are not well educated in the history of the church or in modern critical studies of the church. They probably do not know all the facts themselves. They have been trained, however, to give investigators "milk before meat," that is, to postpone revealing anything at all that might make an investigator hesitant, even if it is true. But you should be aware of these facts before you commit yourself.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Yoda

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Yoda »

Hoops wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote: They've done real harm to real people and I'll be damned If I stay silent.

Are you seriously going to claim your motivation is benevolence?

Why wouldn't it be a valid motivation?
_Stormy Waters

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Stormy Waters »

Hoops wrote:Are you seriously going to claim your motivation is benevolence?


This religion has screwed up my marriage and damaged family relations, so can I claim that I always motivated by righteous indignation? Sure can't. But I do try not to harbor resentment because it is not healthy. All I am saying is that this church deserves serious criticism and has done actual damage to innocent people.
_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _MCB »

All I am saying is that this church deserves serious criticism and has done actual damage to innocent people.
I agree wholeheartedly at that. However, you do need to work that anger out. An excessively emotional response to whatever happened will interfere with your criticism. You belong here.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_Stormy Waters

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Stormy Waters »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Stormy Waters wrote:
Also remember that damning information was intentionally withheld. If I had been told the whole truth up front, then I might agree with your statement.


Jersey Girl wrote:To which damning information do you refer?


Stormy Waters wrote:This

This is also the presentation that he gave. He was a CES institute director and he explains it pretty well.


Come on, Stormy. Even Packham admits the following:

Here is a summary of important facts about the Mormon church, its doctrine, and its history that the missionaries will probably not tell you. We are not suggesting that they are intentionally deceiving you --most of the young Mormons serving missions for the church are not well educated in the history of the church or in modern critical studies of the church. They probably do not know all the facts themselves. They have been trained, however, to give investigators "milk before meat," that is, to postpone revealing anything at all that might make an investigator hesitant, even if it is true. But you should be aware of these facts before you commit yourself.


You might want to try reading that again. He is saying that the MISSIONARIES are not intentionally deceiving you, and I completely agree, they certainly are not. The missionaries are taught to teach this way. But from the church standpoint, it's like selling a car, and not telling the buyer that certain parts are broken. The LDS has perverted the "Milk before meat" teaching from the Bible and used it as an excuse to lie.
Last edited by _Stormy Waters on Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Hoops »

Stormy Waters wrote:
Hoops wrote:Are you seriously going to claim your motivation is benevolence?


This religion has screwed up my marriage and damaged family relations, so can I claim that I always motivated by righteous indignation? Sure can't. But I do try not to harbor resentment because it is not healthy. All I am saying is that this church deserves serious criticism and has done actual damage to innocent people.

None of us can say our motivations are always pure. And I'm truly sorry for your misfortune.

Every church, any church, any institution deserves criticism (except mine, of course. Mainly because I'm in it). But incumbent on you when you criticise any institution is to fairly represent it. If you are doing that, then good. I don't know enough about Mormonism to always know when it's being treated fairly.
_Yoda

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _Yoda »

Stormy Waters wrote:
Hoops wrote:Are you seriously going to claim your motivation is benevolence?


This religion has screwed up my marriage and damaged family relations, so can I claim that I always motivated by righteous indignation? Sure can't. But I do try not to harbor resentment because it is not healthy. All I am saying is that this church deserves serious criticism and has done actual damage to innocent people.

I am so sorry about your marriage, Stormy Waters. :(

Were you guys able to work things out?
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: The "Final Solution"?

Post by _harmony »

Stormy Waters wrote:This

This is also the presentation that he gave. He was a CES institute director and he explains it pretty well.


You couldn't find anything on LDS.org to support your statement? Good grief, there's tons of stuff there. You don't have to use adament ex-Mormons to
illustrate your point, and it weakens your point to use them.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply