RFM v. Midnight Mormons—Debate

[The Stig]

Those idiots showed up in body armor with U.S. flags on them?! Unbelievable.

[pistolero]

Those idiots showed up in body armor with U.S. flags on them?! Unbelievable.

Behave. He's baiting Bill Reel with an extra microphone. Pathetic.

[The Stig]

This grandstanding about BIll Reel is stupid. What assholes.

[drumdude]

Well played Bill. Took the high road in the face of a ridiculous taunt.

[The Stig]

Oh, good grief, Kwaku, you aren't running for office you twit.

[The Stig]

Oh, C'MON, turning on the water works for your Book of Mormon "testimony?!" Uggh. Here comes the Heartsell (tm).

[drumdude]

Untitled2.jpg

[pistolero]

RFM just said "demonstrably", I think Bill Reel actually is taking part in this debate, somehow.

Cardon is all over the shop.

I thought Brad and Kwaku gave a good account of themselves. Articulate and informative. But yes, Kwaku laid it on thick.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Those idiots showed up in body armor with U.S. flags on them?! Unbelievable.

Omg. Lol. What pussies.

- Doc

[Canadiandude2]

They really don’t understand that social constructions can have positive and negative effects without existing beyond human beliefs and conventions.

Furthermore, they need to justify the changes in what the church emphasizes as mattering.

It’s like they wish to ignore every falsifiable statement the brethren ever made.

Lastly, the church has never moderated its view as being true to those that receive spiritual confirmation of such.

Using anecdotal or subjective confirmation still requires the believer to justify why the process cannot produce reliable results, or how they can be sure as to what the experience actually means.

The believer would then also need to justify their subjective process and experience over others that are different or produce results that supposedly signify something else.