wenglund wrote:Not that it matters much, but shouldn't the list be retitled: "The Top Ten Tempests in the MDB Teapot 2008" or "The Top Ten Scratch Obsessions 2008", and this because many of the things listed didn't register a blip on the radar of most LDS apologists?
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Wow, I must be doing something right. Here is Wade "Bobby Peru" Englund, lured out of the MAD closet yet again, and LoaP has fired up a rip-off thread over on the aptly named MADboard.
Mister Scratch wrote:Why don't you quit doing apologetics, then? What's in it for you? What do you gain by doing it?
I gain relatively little. I do it because I believe I should do it.
Mister Scratch wrote:More to the point, why are you so concerned that people might think that you collect a "wad of bills" for doing apologetics? Do you worry that it would undermine your credibility in some way?
Of course it would undermine my credibility.
And that, I expect, is one of the major reasons why you seek to make the charge stick.
wenglund wrote:Not that it matters much, but shouldn't the list be retitled: "The Top Ten Tempests in the MDB Teapot 2008" or "The Top Ten Scratch Obsessions 2008", and this because many of the things listed didn't register a blip on the radar of most LDS apologists?
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Wow, I must be doing something right. Here is Wade "Bobby Peru" Englund, lured out of the MAD closet yet again, and LoaP has fired up a rip-off thread over on the aptly named MADboard.
I haven't the faintest clue who "Bobby Peru" is, nor am I the least acquainted with the thread at MA&D since I haven't visited there for about a week (except to respond to a PM), but you are free to extract as much self-aggrandisement from my brief comment as may be fantacized--not that you could be prevented from doing otherwise.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
Mister Scratch wrote:and LoaP has fired up a rip-off thread over on the aptly named MADboard.
It isn't doing as well as this thread, in my opinion.
Pokatator wrote:And who might those two "Backslappin Bros" be? You and Mr. Plate?
We don't see you two here for quite a while and then all of sudden here you are posting and adding nothing but noise, again.
Was there some kind of emergency alert or all boards bulletin from the l-skinny club or the strengthening members committee telling youse two ta get on over here pronto and make some noise?
I've been sporadically posting here for a while now without any exchange with DCP, actually.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
"Every allegation involving me (or of which I have direct knowledge) in the list above is either false or substantially distorted and misleading". Daniel Peterson
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Bill Clinton
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
LifeOnaPlate wrote:I've been sporadically posting here for a while now without any exchange with DCP, actually.
The thread has to be about DCP before he will acknowledge you. It is really the only thing he likes to talk about.
God has the right to create and to destroy, to make like and to kill. He can delegate this authority if he wishes to. I know that can be scary. Deal with it. Nehor.. Nov 08, 2010
