Corpsegrinder wrote:In which case the sticking point would be all that improvable supernatural stuff.
Uh... no. The stickingpoint, specifically, and completely, is the Diviinity of Christ.
Corpsegrinder wrote:In which case the sticking point would be all that improvable supernatural stuff.
Corpsegrinder wrote:When you say "religions included" you mean Christianity too, right?
Hoops wrote:Corpsegrinder wrote:In which case the sticking point would be all that improvable supernatural stuff.
Uh... no. The stickingpoint, specifically, and completely, is the Diviinity of Christ.
Hoops wrote:I thought we agreed that if you're going waste my time with ridiculous parsing then we'll just go our different ways.
PARSE, verb
1. analyse (a sentence) into its component parts and describe their syntactic roles.
2. Computing analyse (text) into logical syntactic components.
Hoops wrote:Corpsegrinder wrote:But I’m still not a Christian because I reject the supernatural aspects of the Christ myth, right?
The sticking point seems to be all that improvable supernatural stuff.
No, that's not what I wrote. One can not be a Christian and reject the Divinity of Christ.
15 “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
Buffalo wrote:The conscientious alternative to any superstition is secular humanism.
Polygamy-Porter wrote:Jeezuz man! Reach back and pull the garmies outta your butt crack! He was JOKING.
KevinSim wrote:Buffalo wrote:The conscientious alternative to any superstition is secular humanism.
Secular Humanism does an adequate job of meeting humanity's short term needs. What does it do for humanity's long term needs? Is Secular Humanism making progress in ensuring that some good things will last forever?
MrStakhanovite wrote:Can something even endure or perdure forever?
MrStakhanovite wrote:Does forever mean an infinite time span or does it mean just until time runs down?
MrStakhanovite wrote:What good things need to exist forever, and what mode of existence are we speaking about?
MrStakhanovite wrote:Can we equate the existence of a concrete real thing with the existence had by an abstract object that is a-causal?