beastie wrote:If your point was that I was asserting that Dr. Miller had made a deliberate decision to omit information that contradicted his assertion, then why were you referring to the "history of science"?
Two different issues, beastie. Two totally separate and distinct issues.
Sorry you're confused.
beastie wrote:There are not many options for why Dr. Miller omitted this information. I invite you to provide an option other than the ones I've provided.
Do you really have so much trouble focusing?
You asserted that he deliberately deceived.
I noted that you had asserted that he deliberately deceived.
You denied asserting that he had deliberately deceived.
I quoted you saying that he had deliberately deceived.
And now you suddenly act as if that was never at issue.