marg wrote:LDSToronto wrote:Um...do you see the difference between me stating that Jersey Girl had sent me PMs that refuted what she was publicly saying regarding this specific matter, and you divulging information about [personal information deleted]?
LDST..the reason one is not supposed to divulge pm's is because they can be doctored/misrepresented and/or they can negatively impact someone's real life.
You fail to answer the question.
But, since you brought it up, perhaps you'd like to show me where I misrepresented the content of the PMs which I have posted. What have I said in the past that disagrees with the content of Jersey Girl's PMs?
marg wrote:Jersey Girl was essentially forced to give you permission to put the pm's on the board because you were discussing them anyhow.. in your own words.
Once again you have a double standard and you are creating much ado about nothing.
Let me make this really simple - I was given permission. You were not. The only way you would know anything about [personal information deleted] is either participation in chat or private conversations. If Jersey Girl did not give you permission to talk about [personal information deleted] (you know, in your own words, possibly misrepresenting or maligning her) then you are in violation of board rules.
So here is my question: If Jersey Girl says [personal information deleted] is a private matter, will you agree to remove the post you made about the details of [personal information deleted]?
H.