skippy the dead wrote:CaliforniaKid wrote:By the way, I think the statement cited in the OP was deceptive in two directions. First, it suggests that Mormons do not in fact believe the item in question. Second, it suggests that Mormons derive their beliefs about Jesus exclusively from the New Testament. Wouldn't it be easier to say, "the Church doesn't take an official position on that"? Or "I personally believe that, but we do not preach it as one of the doctrines of the Church"?
That would be the better approach. The repetition of "milk before meat" and not teaching what someone is not ready to hear is actually ridiculous. Instead of misleading responses to hard or uncomfortable questions, just be honest and say "That's not something we discuss outside of the membership" or "I don't think you're ready to learn about that without first knowing blah." Deceptive answers serve no purpose other than to deceive, no matter the intent.
Kind of like the bank telling a new homeowner that their payment will only be $1500/month for this beautiful $500K home.
When the borrower asks, "I've been informed and read on the internet that my payment will double in three years, please tell me about this?"
Bank: "Ahhhh that is just not TRUE! And even if it were it would be the worst case. Why would you trust information from the internet? Don't you know it was landlords who built that to keep people like you paying rent?"
Borrower: "Really? I also read that part of the interest for those three years is being ADDED to the mortgage balance, so my home could be worth less than I owe?"
Bank: "Look, if you want to know about us why would you ask someone else? As to your interest, yes.. perhaps a little will be added, but I guarantee you home will rise in value, well above any accumulated interest."
Borrower: "Why won't you give me a full disclosure on this financial transaction before I sign?"
Bank: "There are things that you won't understand until AFTER you commit to this, so just trust me and sign!"