Joseph Fielding Smith: Two-Faced?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

CaliforniaKid wrote:
Gazelam wrote:You obviously got your meat a little too soon and failed to chew it properly.


It would help it the meat was certified Angus instead of a big hunk of pig fat.


God, being Jewish, doesent offer pork. What line did you get in? You must of gotten one of Kim's brown bag specials. Throw it away.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

By the way, I think the statement cited in the OP was deceptive in two directions. First, it suggests that Mormons do not in fact believe the item in question. Second, it suggests that Mormons derive their beliefs about Jesus exclusively from the New Testament. Wouldn't it be easier to say, "the Church doesn't take an official position on that"? Or "I personally believe that, but we do not preach it as one of the doctrines of the Church"?
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

CaliforniaKid wrote:By the way, I think the statement cited in the OP was deceptive in two directions. First, it suggests that Mormons do not in fact believe the item in question. Second, it suggests that Mormons derive their beliefs about Jesus exclusively from the New Testament. Wouldn't it be easier to say, "the Church doesn't take an official position on that"? Or "I personally believe that, but we do not preach it as one of the doctrines of the Church"?


That would be the better approach. The repetition of "milk before meat" and not teaching what someone is not ready to hear is actually ridiculous. Instead of misleading responses to hard or uncomfortable questions, just be honest and say "That's not something we discuss outside of the membership" or "I don't think you're ready to learn about that without first knowing blah." Deceptive answers serve no purpose other than to deceive, no matter the intent.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

skippy the dead wrote:
CaliforniaKid wrote:By the way, I think the statement cited in the OP was deceptive in two directions. First, it suggests that Mormons do not in fact believe the item in question. Second, it suggests that Mormons derive their beliefs about Jesus exclusively from the New Testament. Wouldn't it be easier to say, "the Church doesn't take an official position on that"? Or "I personally believe that, but we do not preach it as one of the doctrines of the Church"?


That would be the better approach. The repetition of "milk before meat" and not teaching what someone is not ready to hear is actually ridiculous. Instead of misleading responses to hard or uncomfortable questions, just be honest and say "That's not something we discuss outside of the membership" or "I don't think you're ready to learn about that without first knowing blah." Deceptive answers serve no purpose other than to deceive, no matter the intent.
Kind of like the bank telling a new homeowner that their payment will only be $1500/month for this beautiful $500K home.

When the borrower asks, "I've been informed and read on the internet that my payment will double in three years, please tell me about this?"

Bank: "Ahhhh that is just not TRUE! And even if it were it would be the worst case. Why would you trust information from the internet? Don't you know it was landlords who built that to keep people like you paying rent?"

Borrower: "Really? I also read that part of the interest for those three years is being ADDED to the mortgage balance, so my home could be worth less than I owe?"

Bank: "Look, if you want to know about us why would you ask someone else? As to your interest, yes.. perhaps a little will be added, but I guarantee you home will rise in value, well above any accumulated interest."

Borrower: "Why won't you give me a full disclosure on this financial transaction before I sign?"

Bank: "There are things that you won't understand until AFTER you commit to this, so just trust me and sign!"
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

In his defense, those quotes were three years apart. Maybe he changed his mind. Three years is an eternity for Doctrine/GA opinion. Does anybody still remember the tattoo and multiple earring ban from a few years ago?
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

KimberlyAnn wrote:I think the secret and/or embarrassing nature of certain aspects of Mormonism foster deceptive behavior.

Mormons, to my thinking, are not at all generally deceptive people, but I know from experience that it's disconcerting to be asked to keep things secret from investigators and even other members. I justified it with the old "pearls before swine" argument, but even with that excuse, I was often uncomfortable with not telling the complete truth at times. I never felt telling people certain things were "sacred" and that I couldn't talk about them was a good answer, but it was the only answer I could give.

Looking back, I resent being asked to keep religious ordinances secret from others--even my own family at times.

KA


I tend to try not to fall back on a "pearls before swine" escape when I am in one-on-one situations, or especially when I know the person I am talking to and feel they know me. Friends know where I stand on some of the less-discussed issues because we have a relationship aside from a happenstance religious discussion.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Boaz & Lidia wrote:How soon before a reporter asks Tommy Monson to reconcile all of Gordon's "I don't know that we teach that" statements?


any reporter who followed up on the story knows that Pres. Hinckley already "reconciled" his statements.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

CaliforniaKid wrote:By the way, I think the statement cited in the OP was deceptive in two directions. First, it suggests that Mormons do not in fact believe the item in question. Second, it suggests that Mormons derive their beliefs about Jesus exclusively from the New Testament. Wouldn't it be easier to say, "the Church doesn't take an official position on that"? Or "I personally believe that, but we do not preach it as one of the doctrines of the Church"?


It seems different people answer questions differently.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

LifeOnaPlate wrote:It seems different people answer questions differently.


In that case, why didn't Abinadi answer King Noah by saying "I don't know that we teach that?"
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Dr. Shades wrote:
LifeOnaPlate wrote:It seems different people answer questions differently.


In that case, why didn't Abinadi answer King Noah by saying "I don't know that we teach that?"


Beats me. When I get to heaven I'll ask him.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
Post Reply