What I've learned from apologetics
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
I'm glad you did that and not me, harm. I almost posted about it and then chose to delete it.
My question is simple: WTF???
My question is simple: WTF???
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
Jersey Girl wrote:I'm glad you did that and not me, harm. I almost posted about it and then chose to delete it.
My question is simple: WTF???
I just wanted people to see that Bond wasn't saying things about Kimberly Ann. It didn't make sense unless the whole conversation was up.
I think it's very strange that the posts were allowed to stand in a thread where they had little or nothing to say about the subject of the thread.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
Were all of those posts you picked up on the same thread, harm? I don't see them all.
Is that a THREADED VIEW???

Is that a THREADED VIEW???

Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
I don't know what that MAD post is about, at all. I am clueless, but no matter the reasons it was made or who made it, I hope Book of Mormon and her family are well.
I also hope the re-posting of those MADB comments here doesn't cause Book of Mormon any duress. I am a bit concerned about that.
Also, Harmony is correct. Bond wasn't talking about me being banned on this board. It was, as I had suspected, a misunderstanding.
KA
I also hope the re-posting of those MADB comments here doesn't cause Book of Mormon any duress. I am a bit concerned about that.
Also, Harmony is correct. Bond wasn't talking about me being banned on this board. It was, as I had suspected, a misunderstanding.
KA
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2555
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
KimberlyAnn wrote:I don't know what that MAD post is about, at all. I am clueless, but no matter the reasons it was made or who made it, I hope Book of Mormon and her family are well.
I also hope the re-posting of those MADB comments here doesn't cause Book of Mormon any duress. I am a bit concerned about that.
Also, Harmony is correct. Bond wasn't talking about me being banned on this board. It was, as I had suspected, a misunderstanding.
I don't know what that part of the thread is about either, and I've read it and even posted in it. The suicidal daughter/cupcake queen bit was really confusing.
Zack's comment makes more sense if he was referring to Mangoes instead of you (although that's still the way I would have read his statement, the way it's worded). Is she the same poster as Moniker on this board? That is the only banning of which I've heard.
I'm glad you are still here. Your posts are a breath of fresh air, a ray of sunshine, a cool breeze on a summer day, a warm blanket at the football game, a... um, sorry, got carried away. :-)
Cheers.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
Thanks, Krose!
I like your posts, too. They're like cookies and milk. Beans and cornbread. Lasagna and crusty garlic bread.
I'm really hungry.
KA
I like your posts, too. They're like cookies and milk. Beans and cornbread. Lasagna and crusty garlic bread.
I'm really hungry.
KA
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4247
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
krose wrote:Is she the same poster as Moniker on this board?
Yes.
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
Harmony maybe the drama has continued on MAD without Moniker's involvement, it is a possibility. It sounds to me as if her mother wrote the note, in which case it could be quite serious and perhaps it's not a good idea to be discussing it here.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2555
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
marg wrote:Harmony maybe the drama has continued on MAD without Moniker's involvement, it is a possibility. It sounds to me as if her mother wrote the note, in which case it could be quite serious and perhaps it's not a good idea to be discussing it here.
Wow, I hope not. Whatever the case, I wish her the best.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: What I've learned from apologetics
marg wrote:Harmony maybe the drama has continued on MAD without Moniker's involvement, it is a possibility. It sounds to me as if her mother wrote the note, in which case it could be quite serious and perhaps it's not a good idea to be discussing it here.
Do you think quotes from MAD threads are offlimits now, marg... or just quotes that I supply? If it's on the net, it's fair game.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.