The Nehor wrote:BishopRic wrote:
Fair enough...and really the only answer that makes sense to me. But to me, it begs the conclusion that it may be exactly the same, and "we" are misinterpreting that it means "we" have the one and only truth.
No?
As I edited into above post how come this only applies to spiritual things? I'm a libertarian and yet others are liberals or conservatives. Do I assume that my knowledge of the rightness of what I think is false simply because others have come to other conclusions?
I think your comparison has merit...but since we're dealing with a form of communication from another sphere of existence (allegedly), and the perceived message is that our religion is the one and only truth for all people, and another's message appears to be the same (for his religion), isn't it most likely that we are misinterpreting the message?
In other words, maybe you, uniquely, fit better as a libertarian, and another as a democrat, but as it relates to religious claims, Mormons and others claim God is not only telling them that their way is good for them, but for everybody else too (or that the others just need to be exterminated...).
So again, because of the dramatic and numerous contradictions, Occam's Razor seems to tell me that most, if not all, perceived spiritual witnesses of some sort of "truth" are not that at all. It's that simple mixture of hormones and circumstances that feel good...and we mistakenly project that as some sort of confirmation of historical truth.
A significant example of this for me was the Paul H. Dunn saga. I felt a spiritual witness quite strongly when I heard his talks...then learned later that they (many) were not true. That "tilt" made me re-think the process.
But maybe I'm just being too logical?