The Nehor wrote:Again one of Scratch's 'most reliable' informants has information that Scratch refuses to commit on. One wonders how much trust Scratch puts in his 'less reliable' informants.
The reason I consider this particular informant "reliable" is because his/her allegations have been the sort of things that would be remarkably easy for the Mopologists to disprove via real, solid, concrete evidence. And yet they never do. For instance, it was alleged that FARMS would suffer heavy financial cutbacks. All DCP had to do in order to dispel the rumors was post the MI's budget. Did he do that? No. Later, it was claimed that FAIR president Scott Gordon met with Elder Oaks. Did they meet? Yes, they did--a fact which the apologists admitted after dodging and denying for close to 72 hours. Now we get a claim that Schryver and DCP have been forbidden by the Brethren from getting into anything resembling a discussion on MDB. This would be stunningly easy to prove false. But with every minute, hour, day, and week that goes by, my "informant"'s claims receive more and more validation.
I'm happy for the claims to be proven false, but for whatever reason, the apologists refuse to do that.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
