Simon Belmont wrote:beefcalf wrote:Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
So is porno, I guess. Does that make it right?
Not necessarily but at least it boosts the Marriott families tithing contributions...
Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?
-
_jon
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am
Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?
Not necessarily but at least it boosts the Marriott families tithing contributions...
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)
Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
-
_Buffalo
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 12064
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
-
_madeleine
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am
Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?
For the record, I didn't take the OP as serious as the rest of y'alls seem to be.
Also, I've sometimes wondered the same thing, in light of Catholics who follow the charism of St. Francis being called Franciscans, and the Dominicans, etc. So, I've wondered why no one ever uses the term "Jesuscans". (?)
Mormons put "ite" on the end of everything, so I thought Buttite worked well.
It's just a play on language, as well. None of which I find to be an offense against God, and doesn't change WHO Jesus IS. None of our silliness or even grave sins does that.
Not to mention, from my POV, Mormonism is a bigger offense against God than one singe person calling himself "Joseph" ever could be.
Peace.
Also, I've sometimes wondered the same thing, in light of Catholics who follow the charism of St. Francis being called Franciscans, and the Dominicans, etc. So, I've wondered why no one ever uses the term "Jesuscans". (?)
Mormons put "ite" on the end of everything, so I thought Buttite worked well.
It's just a play on language, as well. None of which I find to be an offense against God, and doesn't change WHO Jesus IS. None of our silliness or even grave sins does that.
Not to mention, from my POV, Mormonism is a bigger offense against God than one singe person calling himself "Joseph" ever could be.
Peace.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
-
_Dr. Shades
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Re: Aren't you glad Christ was not named Butts?
Nightlion wrote:This is bizarre, however, that you pick this particular thread to demand strict adherence to topic. GAWL! What was the real reason. Hmm?
The real reason was that this particular derailment was reported.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley