Dr. DCP Discusses Dr. Scratch on the MAD Board

[_stemelbow]

So, let me get this straight, do posters here truly think Dr. Peterson is capable of getting physically violent with ex-LDS folks? Do you guys all think it a helpful thing for Scratch to include that in his sig line? Do you think that scratch is being deceptive in its use?

Or do you just like to complain so much about Peterson that if he posts his own concern about this elsewhere that it causes you to think he's really the stalker, that he craves the negative attention, or that he somehow is not opposed to all forms of internet bullying?

you guys...I fear you don't even realize what's going on due to your self-imposed blindness.

[_Buffalo]

So, let me get this straight, do posters here truly think Dr. Peterson is capable of getting physically violent with ex-LDS folks? Do you guys all think it a helpful thing for Scratch to include that in his sig line? Do you think that scratch is being deceptive in its use?

Or do you just like to complain so much about Peterson that if he posts his own concern about this elsewhere that it causes you to think he's really the stalker, that he craves the negative attention, or that he somehow is not opposed to all forms of internet bullying?

you guys...I fear you don't even realize what's going on due to your self-imposed blindness.

I'm positive DCP would never get violent with anyone. "Wheat" on the other hand, I'm not so sure.

But I think you and DCP are both missing the point. It's not a dig against DCP, but against Schryver. in my opinion.

It seems odd for DCP to bring attention to it, though, don't you think? Almost like he's looking for attention?

[_Drifting]

Buffalo, I fear you have used the word "Almost" and the word "like" unnecessarily...

[_stemelbow]

I'm positive DCP would never get violent with anyone. "Wheat" on the other hand, I'm not so sure.

Well, then you can see clearly, I hope, why Peterson would not be happy about someone consistently quoting something, that some seem to take as a joke anyway, concerning him that suggests he would be violent to others, right?

But I think you and DCP are both missing the point. It's not a dig against DCP, but against Schryver. in my opinion.

Doesn't matter. Sans context, sans clarification, it names DCP as one who is planning violence against another. Its not far off some other things Scratch has claimed about DCP I understand.

It seems odd for DCP to bring attention to it, though, don't you think? Almost like he's looking for attention?

What does it matter why? To spin it as though this is a negative to Peterson is just silly. He takes exception to be presented by someone as having violent desires for others. This personal attack from Scratch has gone on and continues to go on. Why is he not allowed to post things in hopes to correct Scratch's attempts to misrepresent him?

[_Drifting]

stemelbow, you have an unwavering loyalty to Dr Peterson. It's almost like how a wife defends her man. How you ever "called out" Peterson for any of the nasty, hateful, vengeful things he has done or said?

[_Molok]

Stem, you know Will wrote the quote in question, not Dr. Scratch, right?

[_LDSToronto]

What does it matter why? To spin it as though this is a negative to Peterson is just silly. He takes exception to be presented by someone as having violent desires for others. This personal attack from Scratch has gone on and continues to go on. Why is he not allowed to post things in hopes to correct Scratch's attempts to misrepresent him?

Actually, stem, Dan is more than welcome to come and post here. I keep telling people, when you post something on the interwebs, it's permanent. Better hope you weren't drunk...

H.

[_Buffalo]

I'm positive DCP would never get violent with anyone. "Wheat" on the other hand, I'm not so sure.

Well, then you can see clearly, I hope, why Peterson would not be happy about someone consistently quoting something, that some seem to take as a joke anyway, concerning him that suggests he would be violent to others, right?

But I think you and DCP are both missing the point. It's not a dig against DCP, but against Schryver. in my opinion.

Doesn't matter. Sans context, sans clarification, it names DCP as one who is planning violence against another. Its not far off some other things Scratch has claimed about DCP I understand.

It seems odd for DCP to bring attention to it, though, don't you think? Almost like he's looking for attention?

What does it matter why? To spin it as though this is a negative to Peterson is just silly. He takes exception to be presented by someone as having violent desires for others. This personal attack from Scratch has gone on and continues to go on. Why is he not allowed to post things in hopes to correct Scratch's attempts to misrepresent him?

If the quote really upsets him that much, shouldn't he be getting in contact with Will to complain about it? Maybe Will should offer a retraction.

[_Buffalo]

It's clear that DCP is still scouring this board, looking for any mention of him at all to complain about over there and play the martyr card he loves so much. A quote in a sig made by Will about Peterson from several years back is the best he could find. Maybe he's feeling neglected.

[_stemelbow]

Thanks for answering my questions, folks. See ya around.