Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Drifting »

RayAgostini wrote:
Drifting wrote:Ray, forgive me if I am putting words into your mouth.

I think you are making the point that Zealotry and Fanaticism are generally harmful attributes no matter from any belief stand point.


I am. There needs to be more understanding and tolerance of Mormons here on this board.



I think more tolerance and understanding of where all peoples viewpoints come from would be helpful, regardless of where they fall on the line between total belief and total unbelief. I myself have been guilty of such intolerance, but I am trying...

There are some great examples on this board:
Consig for instance, and bcspace both seem to behave well towards others even when they do not agree with them.
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_RayAgostini

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _RayAgostini »

Drifting wrote:There are some great examples on this board:
Consig for instance, and bcspace both seem to behave well towards others even when they do not agree with them.


I've long noted this about BC, even on his home board, MAD, before I got banned from there. I'm not very diplomatic, because I don't share the infected dog rabies opinions of Mormonism that many here do. One can be polite while being a total intolerant prick. I think it was Joseph who said something like, give me one who swears a stream a mile long, but can do a good turn, than the long, smooth-faced hypocrite.

So, you see, I can think you're a virtual dick, a damn head, and say so, but I'd be the first to give you credit for being fair-minded.
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Drifting »

RayAgostini wrote:
So, you see, I can think you're a virtual dick, a f*** head, and say so, but I'd be the first to give you credit for being fair-minded.



You are what we call ''a right rum 'un''!
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Darth J »

RayAgostini wrote:
Darth J wrote:
You hurt my feelings, Ray. I am very sad now.


You have feelings? LOL.

I thought you were "past feeling". When you stop mocking, criticising, and denigrating every and anything Mormon, and act like a grown up adult instead of a spoilt brat with a crocodile-size grudge on his shoulders, I might take you seriously.

You ooze hatred for Mormonism. Get over it!


Maybe it was the space aliens who caused Joseph Smith to create the Book of Mormon through automatic writing that came up with the idea of being "past feeling."

RayAgostini wrote:Go ahead and throw away your religious tradition, Darth. Mock it, denigrate it, scorn it, and ridicule it for all the world to see. You do a fine service to humanity. Pat yourself on the back for the growing ridicule of the religion you were born (or converted) into (?).

How Firm a Foundation - Mormon Tabernacle Choir.

Keep the quotes coming, and keep missing the whole point. Enjoy your fifteen minutes of fame here, and when one day you lie down in sorrow, don't hesitate to call upon the God you have so mercilessly ridiculed.


Will do!
_Yoda

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Yoda »

RayAgostini wrote:Hello, MDB,

Do you think that these traits exist in both apologists and critics?

Laird Wilcox
on Extremist Traits
.

Thanks in advance for your opinions.


I have seen elements of these in BOTH apologists and critics.

Take a look at MAD (specifically Pahoran, Juliann, and the other usual suspects) for examples on the apologist side.

ETA--On MDB, we also have Bob Crockett on the apologist side.

On the critic side here are examples of the same thing (our friend, Polygamy Porter, Mercury, Darth J).

That is not to say, however, that these folks don't make compelling arguments at times. I think what is frustrating about the extremist behavior that these folks exhibit, is that we have seen glimpses of what they are capable of when they DON'T resort to the extremist nonsense.
_Yoda

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Yoda »

RayAgostini wrote:
Drifting wrote:There are some great examples on this board:
Consig for instance, and bcspace both seem to behave well towards others even when they do not agree with them.


I've long noted this about BC, even on his home board, MAD, before I got banned from there. I'm not very diplomatic, because I don't share the infected dog rabies opinions of Mormonism that many here do. One can be polite while being a total intolerant prick. I think it was Joseph who said something like, give me one who swears a stream a mile long, but can do a good turn, than the long, smooth-faced hypocrite.

So, you see, I can think you're a virtual dick, a f*** head, and say so, but I'd be the first to give you credit for being fair-minded.


Actually, I believe that BC considers MDB his home board. ;-)

He hates the moderation on MAD.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Buffalo »

Darth J wrote:
1. CHARACTER ASSASSINATION.

Extremists often attack the character of an opponent rather than deal with the facts or issues raised. They will question motives, qualifications, past associations, alleged values, personality, looks, mental health, and so on as a diversion from the issues under consideration. Some of these matters are not entirely irrelevant , but they should not serve to avoid the real issues.

Extremists object strenuously when this is done to them, of course!

2. NAME-CALLING AND LABELING.

Extremists are quick to resort to epithets (racist, subversive, pervert, hate monger, nut, crackpot, degenerate, un-American, anti-semite, red, commie, nazi, kook, fink, liar, bigot, and so on) to label and condemn opponents in order to divert attention from their arguments and to discourage others from hearing them out. These epithets don't have to be proved to be effective; the mere fact that they have been said is often enough.

6. TENDENCY TO VIEW THEIR OPPONENTS AND CRITICS AS ESSENTIALLY EVIL.

To the extremist, opponents hold opposing positions because they are bad people, immoral, dishonest, unscrupulous, mean-spirited, hateful, cruel, or whatever, not merely because they simply disagree, see the matter differently, have competing interests, or are perhaps even mistaken.


Classic!
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Yoda

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Yoda »

Ray wrote:Where were you in 1985, Darth?


If I were to guess, I would say he was a toddler.

;-)
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Kishkumen »

I try not to be an extremist. That is about all I have to say on the subject.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Laird Wilcox on Extremist Traits.

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

liz3564 wrote:
I have seen elements of these in BOTH apologists and critics.

Take a look at MAD (specifically Pahoran, Juliann, and the other usual suspects) for examples on the apologist side.

ETA--On MDB, we also have Bob Crockett on the apologist side.

On the critic side here are examples of the same thing (our friend, Polygamy Porter, Mercury, Darth J).


Where has Darth J engaged in "character assassination"?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Post Reply