A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_KevinSim
_Emeritus
Posts: 2962
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:31 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _KevinSim »

beastie wrote:Anyone who has been in a bad marriage can tell you that celibacy of FAR preferable.

Celibacy is "FAR preferable" to the "bad marriage"? I'll grant you that. But is celibacy preferable to any marriage at all?

Like I said, I'm not a big fan of polygamy, but it seems like there's something inherently wrong in a system that forces a full third of its female members to choose between celibacy and a marriage outside of the faith that's not going to last forever.
KevinSim

Reverence the eternal.
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _LDSToronto »

liz3564 wrote:A revelation came from the Lord that your cherished beloved bride would be required to take another husband. Not only were you to support her, and approve of this, but you were to also be a supportive "brother husband" to this man who would share physical and emotional intimacies with your wife, who is your best friend, lover, and life partner. This "brother husband" would also be sharing your wife's bed, fathering her children, making life decisions with her.

And if you show any sign of jealousy, you are merely told to "suck it up" by other Church members. You just don't understand true faithfulness, and are simply weak. "Someday, you will understand what a blessed commandment this is, and it will all become clear to you."

If you dare....really put yourself in this position. Don't simply dismiss it because it is not the current reality.

Does this at least give you a glimpse as to why accepting plural marriage as an eternal law would be difficult for faithful LDS women to understand or deal with?

I would really appreciate your serious thoughts and discussion on this matter.


Liz, let me ask you to answer honestly: If you were commanded, by the Lord, via the current prophet, to take another husband, would you? If so, why? If not, why not?

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _beastie »

KevinSim wrote:
Like I said, I'm not a big fan of polygamy, but it seems like there's something inherently wrong in a system that forces a full third of its female members to choose between celibacy and a marriage outside of the faith that's not going to last forever.


It only "forces" them to choose celibacy if they refuse to consider marrying "gentiles."

I have seen or read no evidence that has persuaded me thus far that the majority of polygamous marriages were NOT unhappy and unsatisfying for the women. So I think the base assumption that a polygamous option would be the equivalent of a bad marriage is a fair one.

Despite the bizarre and unfounded imaginings of some people, women aren't designed to share a man anymore than men are designed to share a woman.

edited to fix a major typo: addition of word NOT
Last edited by Tator on Sun Jul 08, 2012 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_keithb
_Emeritus
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:09 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _keithb »

beastie wrote:
Anyone who has been in a bad marriage can tell you that celibacy of FAR preferable.


+1,000,000,000
"Joseph Smith was called as a prophet, dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb" -South Park
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _Chap »

keithb wrote:
beastie wrote:
Anyone who has been in a bad marriage can tell you that celibacy of FAR preferable.


+1,000,000,000


Spanish proverb:

Mejor solo que mal acompañado.
(Better alone than badly accompanied.)
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _harmony »

LDSToronto wrote:Liz, let me ask you to answer honestly: If you were commanded, by the Lord, via the current prophet, to take another husband, would you? If so, why? If not, why not?

H.


Hell, no. On some days, I'd give away the one I have!

(sorry,you weren't talking to me...)
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Yoda

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _Yoda »

harmony wrote:
LDSToronto wrote:Liz, let me ask you to answer honestly: If you were commanded, by the Lord, via the current prophet, to take another husband, would you? If so, why? If not, why not?

H.


Hell, no. On some days, I'd give away the one I have!

(sorry,you weren't talking to me...)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Awesome, Harm! LOL

LDST, in answer to your question....No, I would not. He is the only man I have ever been in love with. We have been married for 25 years, and I love him even more now, after 3 children, illnesses, good times, bad times, deaths, births, than I did when he proposed. The bond is unbreakable...pure and simple.

Yes, I really am a sappy, ooey gooey romantic. Sorry for the cavities. :biggrin:
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _moksha »

Liz, what if the husband was some gross old guy who was domineering in all things? Would the old expression "misery loves company" then come into play?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_KevinSim
_Emeritus
Posts: 2962
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:31 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _KevinSim »

beastie wrote:I have seen or read no evidence that has persuaded me thus far that the majority of polygamous marriages were NOT unhappy and unsatisfying for the women. So I think the base assumption that a polygamous option would be the equivalent of a bad marriage is a fair one.

Despite the bizarre and unfounded imaginings of some people, women aren't designed to share a man anymore than men are designed to share a woman.

Let me change the wording slightly.

I, KevinSim, have seen or read no evidence that has persuaded me thus far that the majority of gay and lesbian marriages were NOT unhappy and unsatisfying for at least one spouse in each marriage. So I think the base assumption that a gay and lesbian option would be the equivalent of a bad marriage is a fair one. There are plenty of people who think that, despite the bizarre and unfounded imaginings of some people, men aren't designed to have sex with other men and women aren't designed to have sex with other women.

What's needed here is not conclusions based on one person's lack of seeing evidence of happy polygamous marriages; what's needed here is rigorous studies that have some chance of telling us the well researched truth about this alternate sexual lifestyle. Apply the same open mindedness to polygamy that you do to gay marriage.
KevinSim

Reverence the eternal.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A Scenario for our Male Apologists to Consider...

Post by _harmony »

KevinSim wrote:
beastie wrote:I have seen or read no evidence that has persuaded me thus far that the majority of polygamous marriages were NOT unhappy and unsatisfying for the women. So I think the base assumption that a polygamous option would be the equivalent of a bad marriage is a fair one.

Despite the bizarre and unfounded imaginings of some people, women aren't designed to share a man anymore than men are designed to share a woman.

Let me change the wording slightly.

I, KevinSim, have seen or read no evidence that has persuaded me thus far that the majority of gay and lesbian marriages were NOT unhappy and unsatisfying for at least one spouse in each marriage. So I think the base assumption that a gay and lesbian option would be the equivalent of a bad marriage is a fair one. There are plenty of people who think that, despite the bizarre and unfounded imaginings of some people, men aren't designed to have sex with other men and women aren't designed to have sex with other women.

What's needed here is not conclusions based on one person's lack of seeing evidence of happy polygamous marriages; what's needed here is rigorous studies that have some chance of telling us the well researched truth about this alternate sexual lifestyle. Apply the same open mindedness to polygamy that you do to gay marriage.


I'm completely happy allowing polygamy, polyandry, gay marriage, you name it. I'm not happy applying that to my eternal salvation as a Must Do. Joseph and Brigham can take their multiple wives to hell, because I'm not going to a CK that requires me to share.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply