Kishkumen wrote:I despise pandering to Teabagger lunacy.
As do I.
I also despise pandering to left wing radicals.
Kishkumen wrote:I despise pandering to Teabagger lunacy.
sethpayne wrote:It seems that him being LDS amplifies this angst for a lot of folks who are marginal (like me) or ex-mormon.
To put it another way, when I see Romney's right-wing politics and special interest pandering I don't see anything different from what Huckabee, Gingrich, Perry, or other right-wing politicians would do/say to appeal to the base. It's awful, yes. But do we really expect Romney to be any different than other US politicians?
Honestly, I'll be sitting this election out or writing in a candidates name as I have major concerns about both candidates.
Seth
sethpayne wrote:I am hoping that you (and others here with similar views of Romney) can explain the animosity you have against him and Ann.
palerobber wrote:
one more thing that particularly disappointed me about Romney was when he came out against Muslims being allowed to build a mosque in lower Manhattan, despite the similar trouble he had faced in Boston trying to get a Mormon temple built. it was just stunning hypocrisy, not to mention a violation of his own 11th Article of Faith.
Kishkumen wrote:sethpayne wrote:It seems that him being LDS amplifies this angst for a lot of folks who are marginal (like me) or ex-mormon.
To put it another way, when I see Romney's right-wing politics and special interest pandering I don't see anything different from what Huckabee, Gingrich, Perry, or other right-wing politicians would do/say to appeal to the base. It's awful, yes. But do we really expect Romney to be any different than other US politicians?
Honestly, I'll be sitting this election out or writing in a candidates name as I have major concerns about both candidates.
Seth
I dislike Huckabee, Gingrich, and Perry for different reasons than I dislike Romney. Romney was generally disliked by his Republican rivals in 2008 because of the way he ran his campaign. He is also viewed as a shameless liar by the same group of people. As the de facto nominee, he has nevertheless drawn criticism from the likes of people I would almost never agree with on practically anything.
In short, I think Romney has real problems. I don't want him as my president.
Sethbag wrote:I'm betting that if Romney wins the presidency, he is going to hope that others respect him because of the office he holds. And to win that office, he is body-slamming the current President, saying all kinds of disgusting things. That's sickening.
In a way I do expect more from Romney because he's a Mormon. Growing up TBM, I always expected that truth was very important to me and other Mormons. After all, we were God's representatives on Earth, flying his flag of Truth to the world. Lying, misrepresenting, slandering, cheating, etc. were all abhorrent to me, and disgraceful. As a TBM I would have expected that an faithful Mormon would know better.
I think his politics is just terrible for the Mormon Church. Fully half the country will be utterly appalled by Romney's abject pandering, lying, slandering, and disrespecting of the President of the United States. That means fifty percent of the population might in some small way associate all the worst aspects of Romney's campaign with the Mormon church. I think Romney's campaign, if anything, will make Democrats in this country even more unlikely to want anything to do with the Mormons than they already are.
sethpayne wrote:Another thing I don't understand is why Romney's wealth is held against him. The man is a kick-ass businessperson. I worked closely for many years (as a technical and market data consultant) with PE and Hedge Funds and from my perspective, Bain Capital is a great example of what a PE firm should be. Yes, people lose jobs during M&A but jobs and wealth are also created. In other words, I see PE having a net positive impact on the economy. Many companies that would now be extinct have been rescued by PE. Sure there are some very bad apples out there but I don't see Bain/Romney that way. I agree with Bill Clinton's assesment of PE -- sometimes you do well and sometimes you don't.
Sethbag wrote:Yeah, I was disgusted by a great many of the attacks on Bush. I have never been able to respect groups like Moveon.org for some of their past shenanigans. Bush is an American. Romney is an American, even if his dad was Mexican. ;-) Obama is an American. I reject the delegitimization of people who don't agree with me on every little thing as not real Americans.
By the way, if Romney couldn't win the Presidency without stooping to lies, pandering, and slandering his opponent, then oh well, he should work to change the system. I don't agree that the ends (Romney gets to "save" America) justify the means (Romney has to delegitimize half the country's population as not genuinely American, lie, slander, etc.).
And that attack by the Bush team on McCain in 2008, where it was insinuated in a robocall that McCain had an illegitimate love child with a black woman was a particularly vile concoction of lying, slandering, and racism. Of course I reject that. It was despicable.