Doctor Scratch wrote:We may have been seriously overlooking a key development, Dean. It may very well be that FAIR has been surreptitiously assuming full-blown control of Mopologetics, with all of these MI antics being smokescreen for the actual battle at hand.
If this is true, then we can read between the lines of these two quotes:
Acquiring a thorough knowledge of the available sources is the key to success on Wikipedia. Editors’ own opinions should not remain in Wikipedia articles; cited facts will stand a much better chance of remaining.
Sources such as any LDS Church-sponsored publication are often classified as “biased” and unacceptable by Wikipedia standards.
Opinions won't do, must use "cited facts"; but, aren't these "cited facts" considered "biased" and therefore, not standing a good chance of remaining if they come from LDS Church-sponsored sources? So where can one get the right "sources" to win the battle on wiki? Conveniently, the new "MI" this author is publishing his article in is independent of BYU and, therefore, not an LDS Church-sponsored source. The same goes with FAIR. It would appear he is saying then, that published Mopologetic articles from his circle of friends are the only sources that can win the war with critics and TBMs, and redefine Mormonism through Wikipedia.