No one would risk everything for sex!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _moksha »

There is no such thing as Neutered-Day Saints. Sexual behavior is woven into the fabric our being. No part or tag of Joseph Smith was any less holy because he decided to use it! Indeed, its very usage should have served as the jubilant cry of angels, for it verified his humanity.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_brade
_Emeritus
Posts: 875
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:35 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _brade »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
brade wrote:I honestly don't see what the big deal is in admitting that Joseph probably had sex with women other than his first wife. I mean, that's sort of explicit in the whole project of polygamy. If polygamy was ordained by God, then what's the problem?


I think the big issue is that, if he had sex and was concealing it from Emma and the church at large, it means he was a serial liar.


Sure, but sometimes God approves of that, or something.
_Gaia
_Emeritus
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:02 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Gaia »

moksha wrote: Indeed, its very usage should have served as the jubilant cry of angels, for it verified his humanity.





GAIA:

Uh, Moksha - what else would he have been??
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _moksha »

Gaia wrote:
moksha wrote: Indeed, its very usage should have served as the jubilant cry of angels, for it verified his humanity.




GAIA:

Uh, Moksha - what else would he have been??


Possibly a Satyr or a Wood Nymph. He would for certain be a sexual creature like all the more evolved life forms on our planet.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_brade
_Emeritus
Posts: 875
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:35 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _brade »

bc?
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _sock puppet »

If JSJr and these 'extras' weren't having sex, couldn't they have just opening declared each other BFFs?
_Hades
_Emeritus
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:27 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Hades »

sock puppet wrote:If JSJr and these 'extras' weren't having sex, couldn't they have just opening declared each other BFFs?

It seems they declared each other FWBs.
I'm the apostate your bishop warned you about.
_Tchild
_Emeritus
Posts: 2437
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:44 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Tchild »

brade wrote:bc?

I think he is at the library finding evidences to back up his "pre-adamite" theory of soulless zombie like homo sapiens, wondering about in a world that somehow hadn't "fallen", but had.
_Tchild
_Emeritus
Posts: 2437
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:44 am

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _Tchild »

If the sex were good and the woman super seductively hot, I would probably risk a whole lot.

It's just a man thing.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: No one would risk everything for sex!

Post by _bcspace »

BC: What seems to be the problem, Sister Arbuckle?
SA: Oh, Bishop Space, I am so ashamed of myself! I was tempted and had sex with a ward member.
BC: Which ward member?
SA [bursting into tears]: Brother Loblaw!


Premise doesn't match the subject at hand.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Post Reply