Kishkumen wrote:Ralph Hancock wrote:The two poles of a religiously based progressive morality are not hard to put together — borderless globalism and free “sexual expression.” They are part of the same ethic that seeks to emancipate the individual from the needs and norms of all real, concrete national and religious communities. It’s a stretch, therefore, to imply that such a political perspective can be genuinely grounded in LDS belief.
Every time I read this, I can't help but detect an implicit white nationalism. Now, I don't think Prof. Hancock is consciously a white nationalist. But his vision tends so clearly in that direction that one wonders how many white nationalists take heart when they read these words.
I tend to think what he's talking about is more 'ethno-religion' rather than a race based argument. I'd propose the natural state of mankind is hierarchical and tribal. Basically what we seem to be trending back to politically with resources being controlled and funneled to a top 1% and managed by another 5-10%. The rest of us are just a resource to be utilized by these people because *reasons*.
The Christian paradigm, specifically one man and one woman being married to one another and sexually committed to one another throughout their lives, created a society that produced whole classes of specialized workers, academics, soldiers, artisans, etc... Which in of itself created superior nation-states that was able to dominate the globe.
The perceived threats of liberalism, homosexuality, feminism, et al are deeply troubling to the consevative elements who, even if they don't really understand why they feel the way they do, sense their own power base slipping away. This is why the 1%'ers are able to seize power because they can dupe the consevative elements into voting for them, even if it's ultimately against the former's best interests.
The Leftists need to do a better job at assuaging the sense of vulnerability that the family man and family woman feel. Where Leftists fail is they take aim at them instead of illustrating to them why Consevative leadership doesn't advocate for them.
- Doc