Without a single new fact to go on and on about.
It's perfectly fine to warn about a real or potential conflict of interest in the authors. But the next step is not to reiterate that for thirty-one pages, but to read the book.
A revolutionary thought, I know, on a board where harmony and Boaz & Lidia and Scartch and poor antishock8, among others, contribute so significantly to the overall intellectual tone.
Yes, pulling teeth can be a slow, arduous, and painful process.
In fact, it's pulling teeth to get a "single new fact" as well - for example, did the book mention BY's statement linking the massacre to the Lord's vengeance?
by the way, reading the book will certainly be interesting, and provide information, but as long as other qualified researchers are not allowed access to the same materials, won't really resolve the underlying question regarding conflict of interest.