Lol. Well, hey---we all make mistakes. I guess the real question here is why you've been hounding Paul with your wrong-headed question at the same time that you've been dodging the relevant question he posed to you.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor Scratch wrote:Lol. Well, hey---we all make mistakes. I guess the real question here is why you've been hounding Paul with your wrong-headed question at the same time that you've been dodging the relevant question he posed to you.
I claimed no expertise on this subject, and I do not know the answer to Paul's question.
I claimed no expertise on this subject, and I do not know the answer to Paul's question.
Really? Go search through apologetic Book of Abraham propaganda and see if you can find the king's name. Please realize that the Egyptian language has been restored in modern times through the instrumentality of science and scholarship.
Paul Osborne wrote:Really? Go search through apologetic Book of Abraham propaganda and see if you can find the king's name. Please realize that the Egyptian language has been restored in modern times through the instrumentality of science and scholarship.
Paul O
I like the critical propaganda better, Paul. It is much more entertainingly stupid.
I like the critical propaganda better, Paul. It is much more entertainingly stupid.
Ah more confirmation of bias. This is the difference between members like yourself and members like Zee. People like Zee are unbiased enough to want to understand things as they really are and people like yourself have already decided and won't reconsider.
Themis wrote:Ah more confirmation of bias. This is the difference between members like yourself and members like Zee. People like Zee are unbiased enough to want to understand things as they really are and people like yourself have already decided and won't reconsider.
Double standard. Critics won't see things as they really are, either. They have already decided and will not reconsider.
Themis wrote:Ah more confirmation of bias. This is the difference between members like yourself and members like Zee. People like Zee are unbiased enough to want to understand things as they really are and people like yourself have already decided and won't reconsider.
Double standard. Critics won't see things as they really are, either. They have already decided and will not reconsider.
Most of us critics have looked at the fence from both sides. That gives a perspective that those that have only ever been on the one side do not.
sock puppet wrote:Most of us critics have looked at the fence from both sides. That gives a perspective that those that have only ever been on the one side do not.
It is funny how I can do the same thing, yet come back with the exact opposite view.
sock puppet wrote:Most of us critics have looked at the fence from both sides. That gives a perspective that those that have only ever been on the one side do not.
It is funny how I can do the same thing, yet come back with the exact opposite view.
But you haven't Simon. You have always been on one side. You lack the dimension that a once believing member has over you.
Don't worry, once you disbelieve, you will understand better.