Will Schryver wrote:My contributions, choice of words, and/or posts reflect well on the faith/brethren that I defend? It is one of my defining characteristics.
Then how do you defend putting Droopy and others that have defended you in the uncomfortable position of supporting your denials, when the evidence is overwhelming that you did do what you were reported to have done?
Moksha wrote:Any of the apologists who have read this thread should be alarmed by Will's comments. My guess is they realize that what he said was wrong. I would like to appeal to their decency to discuss this matter privately with Will and see if there are any solutions to be had.
What is alarming to me is that I believe that these matters HAVE been discussed with Will privately, and it hasn't seemed to have had any effect.
Will Schryver wrote:I have, over the course of over five years, made upwards of 10,000 posts on this and that "other" message board (through its various incarnations). Of those 10,000 posts, I have been guilty of being somewhat of a "naughty boy" in about a dozen. Other than my unwarranted characterization of Emma Smith as a "champion bitch"--for which I have sincerely apologized, and my teasing Kimberly Ann on account of what appears to have been a case of mistaken identity (for which I have also apologized), I have no particular regrets for anything I have said.
My colorful characterizations of beastlie and harmony are spot on.
My characterizations of Doctor Scratch and the vast majority of the denizens of the Great and Spacious Trailer Park are spot on.
Even so, these "colorful characterizations" constitute a mere 1/10th of 1% of my total posting output. If measured by words rather than posts, the "colorful characterizations" would likely amount to less than 1/100th of 1% of the whole.
No one has been able (until MsJack's and harmony's recent fabrications out of whole cloth) to add to the list of my offenses for many, many moons now. I guess I've "reformed," as it were. (LOL!)
At any rate, in answer to your question: Yes. Without a doubt. My contributions, choice of words, and/or posts reflect well on the faith/brethren that I defend? It is one of my defining characteristics.
I bet the mob that murdered Joseph Smith only devoted 1/25,000th of their life output to murdering. The rest was spent raising crops and raising kids etc. So it's all good.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
I know that you don't have a problem engaging in character assassination against Mormon critics, but do you have any regrets entangling Droopy in this fiasco? I realize that you can easily justify this in your mind as long as you think that the only people you are hurting are anti-Mormons. But Droopy apparently was willing to defend you, so now you have a faithful TBM who may get hurt when you eventually have to admit that what you are claiming is not true. Does that concern you?
Everything I have claimed IS true, so no, I'm not concerned. Nor am I at all surprised to observe--once again--the hyena-like qualities of the residents of the GSTP, of which you are most certainly one.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
Moksha wrote:Any of the apologists who have read this thread should be alarmed by Will's comments. My guess is they realize that what he said was wrong. I would like to appeal to their decency to discuss this matter privately with Will and see if there are any solutions to be had.
What is alarming to me is that I believe that these matters HAVE been discussed with Will privately, and it hasn't seemed to have had any effect.
I never cease to be amazed at how fantasy and delusion can come to be regarded as reality in this place.
No, lizzie--you of the obscene "Goddess Suite" orgies--no one has discussed "these matters" with me at any time. At least, no one among the people to whom I believe you are referring.
I have discussed "these matters" with my my wife on several occasions. Our conversations were "private." Does that count?
How about her laughing at my "homely waitress" quip directed towards you? Does that make her a misogynist, too?
You know, you ought to get yourself some roller skates so that you can get from table to table a little faster--thereby optimizing your opportunities.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
I know that you don't have a problem engaging in character assassination against Mormon critics, but do you have any regrets entangling Droopy in this fiasco? I realize that you can easily justify this in your mind as long as you think that the only people you are hurting are anti-Mormons. But Droopy apparently was willing to defend you, so now you have a faithful TBM who may get hurt when you eventually have to admit that what you are claiming is not true. Does that concern you?
Everything I have claimed IS true, so no, I'm not concerned. Nor am I at all surprised to observe--once again--the hyena-like qualities of the residents of the GSTP, of which you are most certainly one.
Everyone here seems pretty calm - except you.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
Buffalo wrote:Everyone here seems pretty calm - except you.
[Said as he wipes the froth from his ravening mouth ...]
Hey, I apologize, Mr. Bovine, but I'm afraid I miss most of your posts, seeing as how you have been on my "Ignore" list for quite a while now. You're just not interesting enough to warrant me changing your status.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
Can someone tell me what Mr. Schryver said that made Ms. Harmony delete his comment since:
1) He claims he didn't say the C-word.
2) Claims he already explained what he, in reality, said.
That said:
You're just the homely waitress wandering from table to table here in the singlewide, hoping that someone will get drunk enough to ask you out.
V/R Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
More attacks on women or using an effeminate descriptor on this board by Mr. Schryver:
What do we have here? A new candidate for the GSTP "loathsome specimen of womanhood" award?
What a wuss you can be sometimes! You're like some little pre-pubescent girl who just got told she was ugly by the cute boy in the class! You talk about ridicule as though you've got the corner on the market here. I've got some news for you crybaby: the ridicule you've received wouldn't fill a thimble to the ocean of it I've taken. And I've done it with nary a word of complaint. *coug*
No it didn’t, you deceitful shrew, it talked about your “ugly soul” that would “come through” and render you unattractive.
If so, I’d liken you to a ham hock.
beastlie, you are a lying, deceitful bitch of a woman.
...
And, for the record, I find it difficult to believe that "men" have ever found you attractive, at least not without the aid of excess testosterone, several shots of tequila and extremely dim lighting. You are simply too ugly in soul for it to not show through. It gives me the willies just thinking about what you must really look like ...
Greetings, Harmony!
I just love when you make an appearance here in the Seedy Lounge at the Great and Spacious Trailer Park™, although it is somewhat of a pain to have to grease the door jams to get you in. :lol:
V/R Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Buffalo wrote:Everyone here seems pretty calm - except you.
[Said as he wipes the froth from his ravening mouth ...]
Hey, I apologize, Mr. Bovine, but I'm afraid I miss most of your posts, seeing as how you have been on my "Ignore" list for quite a while now. You're just not interesting enough to warrant me changing your status.
At least you seem to have enough shame to be upset, but maybe for the wrong reasons.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
