(some!!!!) Mormon & exmormon men and the internet

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by _Alter Idem »

asbestosman wrote:Speaking of speaking up, I do recall trying to explain to antishock why I thought some of his comments were misogynistic as well as trying to figure out what possible misunderstanding started him down the warpath.


Yes, you spoke up for me and I really appreciated it. You, Beastie and Liz were the only ones...
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

I apparently got out of the loop on this thread. So, what I see is about a page of naming great male posters on this board and so what's that about? Have we now reached the "feel good" portion of the thread? If all those named are the great guys on this board, who on earth are the offenders?

And just for general purposes of reference, when I posted on this thread, I wasn't thinking about sexual remarks for the most part, I was thinking about condescending language.

Whatever.
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

LifeOnaPlate wrote:What are you saying, wade? That this board is nothing more than the Island of Misfit Toys?

Image


Careful, some people may think it desrespectful to be likened to a toy (misfit or otherwise).

And, with all the talk of sex, the mention of toys may take on a different meaning than the one suggested in your picture. LOL

What I am saying is that we are an Island of Misfit Pets.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Alter Idem wrote:
asbestosman wrote:Speaking of speaking up, I do recall trying to explain to antishock why I thought some of his comments were misogynistic as well as trying to figure out what possible misunderstanding started him down the warpath.


Yes, you spoke up for me and I really appreciated it. You, Beastie and Liz were the only ones...

I guess my point wasn't that I'm better than other guys (I'm not), but that different circumstances make it easier to speak up. I don't thnk antishock has much respect for me, but I still think he can be reasoned with. There are others who have misogynistic rants which I think cannot be reasoned with.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

Jersey Girl wrote:I apparently got out of the loop on this thread. So, what I see is about a page of naming great male posters on this board and so what's that about? Have we now reached the "feel good" portion of the thread? If all those named are the great guys on this board, who on earth are the offenders?

And just for general purposes of reference, when I posted on this thread, I wasn't thinking about sexual remarks for the most part, I was thinking about condescending language.

Whatever.


It started out with condescending language, treatment and "horndogs" in the OP. Then Will said Beastie and I were prudes pretty much. Then marg came in and . I replied and it went off into that tangent. Yet, I think sexual remarks CAN be condescending.

You think Will's sexual remarks aren't condescending?
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

Alter Idem wrote:
asbestosman wrote:Speaking of speaking up, I do recall trying to explain to antishock why I thought some of his comments were misogynistic as well as trying to figure out what possible misunderstanding started him down the warpath.


Yes, you spoke up for me and I really appreciated it. You, Beastie and Liz were the only ones...


A lot more people are speaking up lately. I know for a while I was seen as the shrill one (no doubt) fuming at some of the treatment. I was so pleased to see those that stood up to him.

We all can act poorly, at times. I want to be called out for my bad behavior. I'll repent!
Last edited by Guest on Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Moniker wrote:You think Will's sexual remarks aren't condescending?

I think almost everything about Will is condescending. I despise his "tough-guy" posts whether he's just kidding or really thinks that way. Take Steuss who really is a tough guy. Steuss doesn't post like that at all. And I believe even Silentkid is fairly big on and all. He's not going around acting tough, not even jokingly.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

Mercury wrote:
Hey babe...Excuse me, I'm a little short on cash, would you mind if we shared a cab home together?

(insert other lame ass pick up line)

sorry, just playing my role


I missed this post earlier.

Mercury, you're cool with me. I hope you know that! You know I don't like certain words, yet, you're always my favorite angry ex-mo.
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

asbestosman wrote:
Moniker wrote:You think Will's sexual remarks aren't condescending?

I think almost everything about Will is condescending. I despise his "tough-guy" posts whether he's just kidding or really thinks that way. Take Steuss who really is a tough guy. Steuss doesn't post like that at all. And I believe even Silentkid is fairly big on and all. He's not going around acting tough, not even jokingly.


Agreed.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Moniker wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:I apparently got out of the loop on this thread. So, what I see is about a page of naming great male posters on this board and so what's that about? Have we now reached the "feel good" portion of the thread? If all those named are the great guys on this board, who on earth are the offenders?

And just for general purposes of reference, when I posted on this thread, I wasn't thinking about sexual remarks for the most part, I was thinking about condescending language.

Whatever.


It started out with condescending language, treatment and "horndogs" in the OP. Then Will said Beastie and I were prudes pretty much. Then marg came in and . I replied and it went off into that tangent. Yet, I think sexual remarks CAN be condescending.

You think Will's sexual remarks aren't condescending?


I've read almost nothing of what Will posts on this board. Show me an example. I might read a few lines of his posts and then move on.

Can you paste an example here?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply