Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4247
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
Wow, guys. Don't you think this is getting a little out of hand?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3088
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
CaliforniaKid wrote:Wow, guys. Don't you think this is getting a little out of hand?
1000+
Over the top and headed downhill fast.
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
CaliforniaKid wrote:Wow, guys. Don't you think this is getting a little out of hand?
Indeed. The mockery and character assassination of Professor Peterson and Mormons in general on this board has been out of hand for quite a few years now.
Thanks for bringing some balance to this, Chris.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14190
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
RayAgostini wrote:CaliforniaKid wrote:Wow, guys. Don't you think this is getting a little out of hand?
Indeed. The mockery and character assassination of Professor Peterson and Mormons in general on this board has been out of hand for quite a few years now.
Thanks for bringing some balance to this, Chris.
From the man who said:
Make s*** up? Both you and Scratch are deceiving scum of the first order. Both liars.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
Chap wrote:From the man who said:Make s*** up? Both you and Scratch are deceiving scum of the first order. Both liars.
Do you understand the concept of irony? Or are you just thick?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
I think you know very well that this is not what Chris said.
Why all the nonsensical psychobabble about motives, agendas etc? You have no way of lnowing any of this so you just come across as a bitter jackass very much like most mopologists.
Peterson has done wrong by many of us here. All we've done is point out his own agenda and hypocrisy. You turn a blind eye to his faults while pretending he is a victim? Seriously?
Peterson is intellectually dishonest in a number of ways and he attacks apostates on a regular basis using the church as his publication venue. He has no integrity because he refuses to debate the issues or answer direct questions. He just runs over to MAD or NAMIR to launch his attacks where he lnows he wont have to deal with refutations or criticism. So please stop acting like Dan has it bad. He made his own bed.
Why all the nonsensical psychobabble about motives, agendas etc? You have no way of lnowing any of this so you just come across as a bitter jackass very much like most mopologists.
Peterson has done wrong by many of us here. All we've done is point out his own agenda and hypocrisy. You turn a blind eye to his faults while pretending he is a victim? Seriously?
Peterson is intellectually dishonest in a number of ways and he attacks apostates on a regular basis using the church as his publication venue. He has no integrity because he refuses to debate the issues or answer direct questions. He just runs over to MAD or NAMIR to launch his attacks where he lnows he wont have to deal with refutations or criticism. So please stop acting like Dan has it bad. He made his own bed.
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
Kevin Graham wrote:I think you know very well that this is not what Chris said.
Why all the nonsensical psychobabble about motives, agendas etc? You have no way of lnowing any of this so you just come across as a bitter jackass very much like most mopologists.
Peterson has done wrong by many of us here. All we've done is point out his own agenda and hypocrisy. You turn a blind eye to his faults while pretending he is a victim? Seriously?
Peterson is intellectually dishonest in a number of ways and he attacks apostates on a regular basis using the church as his publication venue. He has no integrity because he refuses to debate the issues or answer direct questions. He just runs over to MAD or NAMIR to launch his attacks where he lnows he wont have to deal with refutations or criticism. So please stop acting like Dan has it bad. He made his own bed.
From the most bitter and foul-mouthed apostate on MDB? Yeah, I'll take you seriously, dude.
You are one hell of a show.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
Who really has it worse. Dan who is criticized on a forum he has already successfully convinced his flock is a pig sty that must be avoided at all costs... or people like Dehlin, whose only crime is trying to help struggling Mormons and who, thanks to people like Dan, must constantly be looking for over his shoulders for the orthodoxy police and watching to see when he gets attacked in a tithe funded publication?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
The fact is you have no argument Ray. You sound like some pissed off kid who doesn't like the fact that his friend, who is a bully, is getting a taste of his own medicine.
All you have done here is psychoanalyze us all. Just to defend your buddy.
All you have done here is psychoanalyze us all. Just to defend your buddy.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 13037
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non
If the only way you can defend Dan is by attacking everyone else, then you lose all credibility.