Apostacy big winner at oscars

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ray A

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Ray A »

marg wrote:
RAy which theory do you think is the best fit theory for Who Wrote the Book of Mormon.


Not Spalding.

marg wrote:And please answer my question in a previous post, what do you mean by primary evidence and why do you consider that strong evidence.


You don't know what primary evidence means?

Yeah, that would be consistent with the rest of your 25 watt defective software waffle.

Then I must remind myself. marg is the woman who has read nothing, but knows everything.
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Ray A wrote:
marg wrote:
RAy which theory do you think is the best fit theory for Who Wrote the Book of Mormon.


Not Spalding.

marg wrote:And please answer my question in a previous post, what do you mean by primary evidence and why do you consider that strong evidence.


You don't know what primary evidence means?

Yeah, that would be consistent with the rest of your 25 watt defective software waffle.

Then I must remind myself. marg is the woman who has read nothing, but knows everything.


What an imbecilic reply. How many beers is that now Ray?
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Ray A wrote:
marg wrote:Ray you can't bulldoze a theory through. You either are able to discuss it or not. Which is it?


You're the one presenting the theory, not me. (reality check)


Sure Ray, I do think the S/R thoery is the best fit theory for the data. Since you don't accept that theory what theory to you think is the best fit theory for all the data?

marg wrote:Even if you accept Book of Mormon witnesses, you still have a theory on how the Book of Mormon was written. So briefly what is the best fit theory according to you for how the Book of Mormon was written?


Not by Joseph placing a MS in a hat, which is your theory.


No Ray that's not my theory. Look if you don't want carry on a discussion, then fine...bye. Go have your beer.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Wow

What happened to the main topic of this thread?

I leave it alone for a day and it all falls to pieces.

:mrgreen:
_marg

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _marg »

Jason Bourne wrote:Wow

What happened to the main topic of this thread?

I leave it alone for a day and it all falls to pieces.

:mrgreen:


I believe there were 2 posts of yours that I didn't look at yet. If I do respond it won't be until tonight or tomorrow.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jason Bourne »

I believe there were 2 posts of yours that I didn't look at yet. If I do respond it won't be until tonight or tomorrow.


Thanks and no hurries.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _harmony »

Jason Bourne wrote:Wow

What happened to the main topic of this thread?

I leave it alone for a day and it all falls to pieces.

:mrgreen:


I was wondering the same thing. How did a thread essentially about homosexuality get highjacked into a pissing contest about Book of Mormon authorship? Especially since we already have a huge thread about said authorship?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jersey Girl »

harmony wrote:
I was wondering the same thing. How did a thread essentially about homosexuality get highjacked into a pissing contest about Book of Mormon authorship? Especially since we already have a huge thread about said authorship?


The thing you could do, harm, is scroll back about oh, about 5 pages and see where it began to shift.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jason Bourne »


The thing you could do, harm, is scroll back about oh, about 5 pages and see where it began to shift.


Harmony

Don't do it. Take my word for it. You don't want to do this. :eek:
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Apostacy big winner at oscars

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Jason Bourne wrote:

The thing you could do, harm, is scroll back about oh, about 5 pages and see where it began to shift.


Harmony

Don't do it. Take my word for it. You don't want to do this. :eek:


Walk away from the thread, Mr. Bourne. Just walk away.
:mrgreen:
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply