William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _wenglund »

Buffalo wrote: Was Will's recent attack/threats against David Bokovoy another example of parody? :D


You will have to direct that question to those who believe Will attacked/threatened Bokovoy.

(Please don't be so dumb as to mistakenly assume again that the above is an argument)

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Will Schryver »

Kevin Graham wrote:You've denied attacking many people you've attacked, so I'm inclined to accept Bokovoy's claim.

As I suspected, there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Nothing new about that ...

And, on that note, I'll take my leave once again. I'm sure you'll be able to carry on without me.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Will Schryver wrote:
Kevin Graham wrote:You've denied attacking many people you've attacked, so I'm inclined to accept Bokovoy's claim.

As I suspected, there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Nothing new about that ...

And, on that note, I'll take my leave once again. I'm sure you'll be able to carry on without me.


The fact that a credible scholar has accused a proven liar, who has a history of doing that exact thing, is evidence in and of itself. Testimony evidence is evidence the same as document evidence.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Kevin Graham wrote:You attack anyone who doesn't gleefully accept your crackpot theories. William Law would be proud (except for your cowardice, of course)

Wait, what? Forgive the momentary derail, but what was William Law's crackpot theory, and who did he attack who didn't accept it?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Buffalo »

Bumping for curious lurkers from MAD.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Will Schryver wrote:P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?


Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Nomad
_Emeritus
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Nomad »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?


Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

Will Schryver never said any such thing. I'm sure you know it too. You are a shameful liar.
... she said that she was ready to drive up to Salt Lake City and confront ... Church leaders ... while well armed. The idea was ... dropped ... [because] she didn't have a 12 gauge with her.
-DrW about his friends (Link)
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Post by _Runtu »

Nomad wrote:Will Schryver never said any such thing. I'm sure you know it too. You are a shameful liar.


I've never seen a citation for this, either, so I'll CFR for this statement attributed to William.

I have a feeling we're going to see more of you over the next week or so. ;-)
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Bump.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Ludd
_Emeritus
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:31 am

Re: William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologe

Post by _Ludd »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?


Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

I agree that this is rather offensive. Where is the link to this statement?
Post Reply